[PATCH -next 0/2] Fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in error handle
This two patches fixed the unbalanced PM disable depth. It could avoid pm_runtime implementation complains when removing and probing again the driver.
Zhang Qilong (2): ASoC: mediatek: mt8192:Fix Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in mt8192_afe_pcm_dev_probe ASoC: mediatek: mt8183: Fix Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8183/mt8183-afe-pcm.c | 43 ++++++++++++++-------- sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-pcm.c | 27 +++++++++----- 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Add missing pm_runtime_disable() when probe error out. It could avoid pm_runtime implementation complains when removing and probing again the driver.
Fixes:125ab5d588b0b ("ASoC: mediatek: mt8192: add platform driver") Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong zhangqilong3@huawei.com --- sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-pcm.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-pcm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-pcm.c index 7a1724f5ff4c..31c280339c50 100644 --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-pcm.c @@ -2229,12 +2229,13 @@ static int mt8192_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) afe->regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->parent->of_node); if (IS_ERR(afe->regmap)) { dev_err(dev, "could not get regmap from parent\n"); - return PTR_ERR(afe->regmap); + ret = PTR_ERR(afe->regmap); + goto err_pm_disable; } ret = regmap_attach_dev(dev, afe->regmap, &mt8192_afe_regmap_config); if (ret) { dev_warn(dev, "regmap_attach_dev fail, ret %d\n", ret); - return ret; + goto err_pm_disable; }
/* enable clock for regcache get default value from hw */ @@ -2244,7 +2245,7 @@ static int mt8192_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret = regmap_reinit_cache(afe->regmap, &mt8192_afe_regmap_config); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "regmap_reinit_cache fail, ret %d\n", ret); - return ret; + goto err_pm_disable; }
pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev); @@ -2257,8 +2258,10 @@ static int mt8192_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) afe->memif_size = MT8192_MEMIF_NUM; afe->memif = devm_kcalloc(dev, afe->memif_size, sizeof(*afe->memif), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!afe->memif) - return -ENOMEM; + if (!afe->memif) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto err_pm_disable; + }
for (i = 0; i < afe->memif_size; i++) { afe->memif[i].data = &memif_data[i]; @@ -2272,22 +2275,26 @@ static int mt8192_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) afe->irqs_size = MT8192_IRQ_NUM; afe->irqs = devm_kcalloc(dev, afe->irqs_size, sizeof(*afe->irqs), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!afe->irqs) - return -ENOMEM; + if (!afe->irqs) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto err_pm_disable; + }
for (i = 0; i < afe->irqs_size; i++) afe->irqs[i].irq_data = &irq_data[i];
/* request irq */ irq_id = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); - if (irq_id < 0) - return irq_id; + if (irq_id < 0) { + ret = irq_id; + goto err_pm_disable; + }
ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq_id, mt8192_afe_irq_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE, "asys-isr", (void *)afe); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "could not request_irq for Afe_ISR_Handle\n"); - return ret; + goto err_pm_disable; }
/* init sub_dais */
Add missing pm_runtime_disable() when probe error out. It could avoid pm_runtime implementation complains when removing and probing again the driver.
Fixes:a94aec035a122 ("ASoC: mediatek: mt8183: add platform driver") Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong zhangqilong3@huawei.com --- sound/soc/mediatek/mt8183/mt8183-afe-pcm.c | 43 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8183/mt8183-afe-pcm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8183/mt8183-afe-pcm.c index c4a598cbbdaa..14e77df06b01 100644 --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8183/mt8183-afe-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8183/mt8183-afe-pcm.c @@ -1119,25 +1119,26 @@ static int mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) afe->regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->parent->of_node); if (IS_ERR(afe->regmap)) { dev_err(dev, "could not get regmap from parent\n"); - return PTR_ERR(afe->regmap); + ret = PTR_ERR(afe->regmap); + goto err_pm_disable; } ret = regmap_attach_dev(dev, afe->regmap, &mt8183_afe_regmap_config); if (ret) { dev_warn(dev, "regmap_attach_dev fail, ret %d\n", ret); - return ret; + goto err_pm_disable; }
rstc = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "audiosys"); if (IS_ERR(rstc)) { ret = PTR_ERR(rstc); dev_err(dev, "could not get audiosys reset:%d\n", ret); - return ret; + goto err_pm_disable; }
ret = reset_control_reset(rstc); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "failed to trigger audio reset:%d\n", ret); - return ret; + goto err_pm_disable; }
/* enable clock for regcache get default value from hw */ @@ -1147,7 +1148,7 @@ static int mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret = regmap_reinit_cache(afe->regmap, &mt8183_afe_regmap_config); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "regmap_reinit_cache fail, ret %d\n", ret); - return ret; + goto err_pm_disable; }
pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev); @@ -1160,8 +1161,10 @@ static int mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) afe->memif_size = MT8183_MEMIF_NUM; afe->memif = devm_kcalloc(dev, afe->memif_size, sizeof(*afe->memif), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!afe->memif) - return -ENOMEM; + if (!afe->memif) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto err_pm_disable; + }
for (i = 0; i < afe->memif_size; i++) { afe->memif[i].data = &memif_data[i]; @@ -1178,22 +1181,26 @@ static int mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) afe->irqs_size = MT8183_IRQ_NUM; afe->irqs = devm_kcalloc(dev, afe->irqs_size, sizeof(*afe->irqs), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!afe->irqs) - return -ENOMEM; + if (!afe->irqs) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto err_pm_disable; + }
for (i = 0; i < afe->irqs_size; i++) afe->irqs[i].irq_data = &irq_data[i];
/* request irq */ irq_id = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); - if (irq_id < 0) - return irq_id; + if (irq_id < 0) { + ret = irq_id; + goto err_pm_disable; + }
ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq_id, mt8183_afe_irq_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE, "asys-isr", (void *)afe); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "could not request_irq for asys-isr\n"); - return ret; + goto err_pm_disable; }
/* init sub_dais */ @@ -1204,7 +1211,7 @@ static int mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret) { dev_warn(afe->dev, "dai register i %d fail, ret %d\n", i, ret); - return ret; + goto err_pm_disable; } }
@@ -1213,7 +1220,7 @@ static int mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret) { dev_warn(afe->dev, "mtk_afe_combine_sub_dai fail, ret %d\n", ret); - return ret; + goto err_pm_disable; }
afe->mtk_afe_hardware = &mt8183_afe_hardware; @@ -1229,7 +1236,7 @@ static int mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) NULL, 0); if (ret) { dev_warn(dev, "err_platform\n"); - return ret; + goto err_pm_disable; }
ret = devm_snd_soc_register_component(afe->dev, @@ -1238,10 +1245,14 @@ static int mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) afe->num_dai_drivers); if (ret) { dev_warn(dev, "err_dai_component\n"); - return ret; + goto err_pm_disable; }
return ret; + +err_pm_disable: + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); + return ret; }
static int mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 22:11:02 +0800, Zhang Qilong wrote:
This two patches fixed the unbalanced PM disable depth. It could avoid pm_runtime implementation complains when removing and probing again the driver.
Zhang Qilong (2): ASoC: mediatek: mt8192:Fix Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in mt8192_afe_pcm_dev_probe ASoC: mediatek: mt8183: Fix Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe
[...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/2] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192:Fix Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in mt8192_afe_pcm_dev_probe commit: 2af2f861edd21c1456ef7dbec52122ce1b581568 [2/2] ASoC: mediatek: mt8183: Fix Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe commit: 19f479c37f76e926a6c0bec974a4d09826e32fc6
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown -
Zhang Qilong