[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Fix snd_soc_instantiate_card error path
From 0443551476ee6fabe45a0fbc7460dca8e0f6a965 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Axel Lin axel.lin@gmail.com Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:12:29 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: Fix snd_soc_instantiate_card error path
Properly free the resources in the case of snd_card_register failure and soc_register_ac97_dai_link failure.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel.lin@gmail.com ---
This patch is against linux-next tree.
In the case of soc_register_ac97_dai_link failure, I think we need below fix for Linus's tree: Add while (--i >= 0) soc_unregister_ac97_dai_link(&card->rtd[i]); just before goto probe_dai_err; Should I also send a patch against Linus's tree?
Regards, Axel
sound/soc/soc-core.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c index 392d336..b4c8c38 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c @@ -1839,18 +1839,20 @@ static void snd_soc_instantiate_card(struct snd_soc_card *card) ret = snd_card_register(card->snd_card); if (ret < 0) { printk(KERN_ERR "asoc: failed to register soundcard for %s\n", card->name); - goto probe_dai_err; + goto probe_aux_dev_err; }
#ifdef CONFIG_SND_SOC_AC97_BUS /* register any AC97 codecs */ for (i = 0; i < card->num_rtd; i++) { - ret = soc_register_ac97_dai_link(&card->rtd[i]); - if (ret < 0) { - printk(KERN_ERR "asoc: failed to register AC97 %s\n", card->name); - goto probe_dai_err; - } + ret = soc_register_ac97_dai_link(&card->rtd[i]); + if (ret < 0) { + printk(KERN_ERR "asoc: failed to register AC97 %s\n", card->name); + while (--i >= 0) + soc_unregister_ac97_dai_link(&card->rtd[i]); + goto probe_aux_dev_err; } + } #endif
card->instantiated = 1;
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:06 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
From 0443551476ee6fabe45a0fbc7460dca8e0f6a965 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Axel Lin axel.lin@gmail.com Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:12:29 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: Fix snd_soc_instantiate_card error path
Properly free the resources in the case of snd_card_register failure and soc_register_ac97_dai_link failure.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel.lin@gmail.com
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood lrg@slimlogic.co.uk
This patch is against linux-next tree.
In the case of soc_register_ac97_dai_link failure, I think we need below fix for Linus's tree: Add while (--i >= 0) soc_unregister_ac97_dai_link(&card->rtd[i]); just before goto probe_dai_err; Should I also send a patch against Linus's tree?
Yes please.
Thanks
Liam
participants (2)
-
Axel Lin
-
Liam Girdwood