[PATCH] ASoC: soc-core.c: setup rtd->pmdown_time at soc_new_pcm_runtime()
From: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Almost all default rtd->xxx are setup at soc_new_pcm_runtime() which is sub-function of snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime() (A). But "rtd->pmdown_time" is setup at soc_init_pcm_runtime() (B). It is very random timing setup. This patch setup it at (A), same as other rtd->xxx.
static int snd_soc_bind_card(...) { ... for_each_card_prelinks(...) { (A) ret = snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime(...); ... } ... for_each_card_rtds(...) { (B) ret = soc_init_pcm_runtime(...); ... } ... }
One note is that current topology/intel are directly calling snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime() (A) without calling soc_init_pcm_runtime() (B). This means, its "rtd->pmdown_time settings" was 0, but will have default value by this patch.
"rtd->pmdown_time settings" will be used at snd_soc_runtime_ignore_pmdown_time(). This patch adds "ignore_pmdown_time" to these driver to keep compatibility.
bool snd_soc_runtime_ignore_pmdown_time(...) { ... => if (!rtd->pmdown_time || rtd->dai_link->ignore_pmdown_time) return true; ... }
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com --- sound/soc/intel/avs/boards/hdaudio.c | 1 + sound/soc/soc-core.c | 4 +--- sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/avs/boards/hdaudio.c b/sound/soc/intel/avs/boards/hdaudio.c index d2fc41d39448..073663ba140d 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/avs/boards/hdaudio.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/avs/boards/hdaudio.c @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static int avs_create_dai_links(struct device *dev, struct hda_codec *codec, int dl[i].dpcm_capture = 1; dl[i].platforms = platform; dl[i].num_platforms = 1; + dl[i].ignore_pmdown_time = 1;
dl[i].codecs = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dl->codecs), GFP_KERNEL); dl[i].cpus = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dl->cpus), GFP_KERNEL); diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c index e020ab49cfb1..df2bd8098c63 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c @@ -487,6 +487,7 @@ static struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *soc_new_pcm_runtime( rtd->card = card; rtd->dai_link = dai_link; rtd->num = card->num_rtd++; + rtd->pmdown_time = pmdown_time; /* default power off timeout */
/* see for_each_card_rtds */ list_add_tail(&rtd->list, &card->rtd_list); @@ -1247,9 +1248,6 @@ static int soc_init_pcm_runtime(struct snd_soc_card *card, struct snd_soc_component *component; int ret, num, i;
- /* set default power off timeout */ - rtd->pmdown_time = pmdown_time; - /* do machine specific initialization */ ret = snd_soc_link_init(rtd); if (ret < 0) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c index b101db85446f..c3be24b2fac5 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c @@ -1755,6 +1755,7 @@ static int soc_tplg_fe_link_create(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
/* enable DPCM */ link->dynamic = 1; + link->ignore_pmdown_time = 1; link->dpcm_playback = le32_to_cpu(pcm->playback); link->dpcm_capture = le32_to_cpu(pcm->capture); if (pcm->flag_mask)
On Fri, 9 Sep 2022 01:19:18 +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
From: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Almost all default rtd->xxx are setup at soc_new_pcm_runtime() which is sub-function of snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime() (A). But "rtd->pmdown_time" is setup at soc_init_pcm_runtime() (B). It is very random timing setup. This patch setup it at (A), same as other rtd->xxx.
[...]
Applied to
broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: soc-core.c: setup rtd->pmdown_time at soc_new_pcm_runtime() commit: c403dcd8b0c4dc01974329e38dc3f82859fd6f99
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Kuninori Morimoto
-
Mark Brown