[PATCH] ASoC: max98390: Fix potential crash during param fw loading
malformed firmware file can cause out-of-bound access and crash during dsm_param bin loading. - add MIN/MAX param size to avoid out-of-bound access. - read start addr and size of param and check bound.
Signed-off-by: Steve Lee steves.lee@maximintegrated.com --- sound/soc/codecs/max98390.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++----- sound/soc/codecs/max98390.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/max98390.c b/sound/soc/codecs/max98390.c index be7cd0aeb6a6..8c7db568fe64 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/max98390.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/max98390.c @@ -754,6 +754,7 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_driver max98390_dai[] = { static int max98390_dsm_init(struct snd_soc_component *component) { int ret; + int param_size, param_start_addr; char filename[128]; const char *vendor, *product; struct max98390_priv *max98390 = @@ -780,14 +781,27 @@ static int max98390_dsm_init(struct snd_soc_component *component) dev_dbg(component->dev, "max98390: param fw size %zd\n", fw->size); + if (fw->size < MAX98390_DSM_PARAM_MIN_SIZE) { + dev_err(component->dev, + "param fw is invalid.\n"); + goto err_alloc; + } dsm_param = (char *)fw->data; + param_start_addr = (dsm_param[0] & 0xff) | (dsm_param[1] & 0xff) << 8; + param_size = (dsm_param[2] & 0xff) | (dsm_param[3] & 0xff) << 8; + if (param_size > MAX98390_DSM_PARAM_MAX_SIZE || + param_start_addr < DSM_STBASS_HPF_B0_BYTE0) { + dev_err(component->dev, + "param fw is invalid.\n"); + goto err_alloc; + } dsm_param += MAX98390_DSM_PAYLOAD_OFFSET; - regmap_bulk_write(max98390->regmap, DSM_EQ_BQ1_B0_BYTE0, - dsm_param, - fw->size - MAX98390_DSM_PAYLOAD_OFFSET); - release_firmware(fw); + regmap_bulk_write(max98390->regmap, param_start_addr, + dsm_param, param_size); regmap_write(max98390->regmap, MAX98390_R23E1_DSP_GLOBAL_EN, 0x01);
+err_alloc: + release_firmware(fw); err: return ret; } @@ -847,7 +861,6 @@ static int max98390_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component)
/* Dsm Setting */ regmap_write(max98390->regmap, DSM_VOL_CTRL, 0x94); - regmap_write(max98390->regmap, DSMIG_EN, 0x19); regmap_write(max98390->regmap, MAX98390_R203A_AMP_EN, 0x80); if (max98390->ref_rdc_value) { regmap_write(max98390->regmap, DSM_TPROT_RECIP_RDC_ROOM_BYTE0, diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/max98390.h b/sound/soc/codecs/max98390.h index f59cb114d957..5f444e7779b0 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/max98390.h +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/max98390.h @@ -650,7 +650,8 @@
/* DSM register offset */ #define MAX98390_DSM_PAYLOAD_OFFSET 16 -#define MAX98390_DSM_PAYLOAD_OFFSET_2 495 +#define MAX98390_DSM_PARAM_MAX_SIZE 770 +#define MAX98390_DSM_PARAM_MIN_SIZE 670
struct max98390_priv { struct regmap *regmap;
On Wed, 03 Jun 2020 13:18:19 +0200, Steve Lee wrote:
@@ -847,7 +861,6 @@ static int max98390_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component)
/* Dsm Setting */ regmap_write(max98390->regmap, DSM_VOL_CTRL, 0x94);
- regmap_write(max98390->regmap, DSMIG_EN, 0x19);
Is this change intentional? It wasn't mentioned in the patch description.
thanks,
Takashi
-----Original Message----- From: Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 8:24 PM To: Steve Lee SteveS.Lee@maximintegrated.com Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com; broonie@kernel.org; perex@perex.cz; tiwai@suse.com; ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com; geert@linux-m68k.org; rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; shumingf@realtek.com; srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org; krzk@kernel.org; dmurphy@ti.com; jack.yu@realtek.com; nuno.sa@analog.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; ryan.lee.maxim@gmail.com; Ryan Lee RyanS.Lee@maximintegrated.com; steves.lee.maxim@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98390: Fix potential crash during param fw loading
EXTERNAL EMAIL
On Wed, 03 Jun 2020 13:18:19 +0200, Steve Lee wrote:
@@ -847,7 +861,6 @@ static int max98390_probe(struct snd_soc_component
*component)
/* Dsm Setting */ regmap_write(max98390->regmap, DSM_VOL_CTRL, 0x94);
regmap_write(max98390->regmap, DSMIG_EN, 0x19);Is this change intentional? It wasn't mentioned in the patch description.
It should be another change. I will re-send the patch.
thanks,
Takashi
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 08:18:19PM +0900, Steve Lee wrote:
- param_start_addr = (dsm_param[0] & 0xff) | (dsm_param[1] & 0xff) << 8;
- param_size = (dsm_param[2] & 0xff) | (dsm_param[3] & 0xff) << 8;
- if (param_size > MAX98390_DSM_PARAM_MAX_SIZE ||
param_start_addr < DSM_STBASS_HPF_B0_BYTE0) {dev_err(component->dev,"param fw is invalid.\n");goto err_alloc;- }
This is now reading the size out of the header of the file which is good but it should also validate that the file is big enough to have this much data in it, otherwise it's possible to read beyond the end of the firmware file (eg, if it got truncated somehow). Previously the code used the size of the file read from disk so that wasn't an issue.
-----Original Message----- From: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 8:32 PM To: Steve Lee SteveS.Lee@maximintegrated.com Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com; perex@perex.cz; tiwai@suse.com; ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com; geert@linux-m68k.org; rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; shumingf@realtek.com; srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org; krzk@kernel.org; dmurphy@ti.com; jack.yu@realtek.com; nuno.sa@analog.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; ryan.lee.maxim@gmail.com; Ryan Lee RyanS.Lee@maximintegrated.com; steves.lee.maxim@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98390: Fix potential crash during param fw loading
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 08:18:19PM +0900, Steve Lee wrote:
- param_start_addr = (dsm_param[0] & 0xff) | (dsm_param[1] & 0xff) <<
8;
- param_size = (dsm_param[2] & 0xff) | (dsm_param[3] & 0xff) << 8;
- if (param_size > MAX98390_DSM_PARAM_MAX_SIZE ||
param_start_addr < DSM_STBASS_HPF_B0_BYTE0) {dev_err(component->dev,"param fw is invalid.\n");goto err_alloc;- }
This is now reading the size out of the header of the file which is good but it should also validate that the file is big enough to have this much data in it, otherwise it's possible to read beyond the end of the firmware file (eg, if it got truncated somehow). Previously the code used the size of the file read from disk so that wasn't an issue.
Thanks for quick comment. Can this case cover by below line? + if (fw->size < MAX98390_DSM_PARAM_MIN_SIZE) { + dev_err(component->dev, + "param fw is invalid.\n"); + goto err_alloc; + }
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 11:37:44AM +0000, Steve Lee wrote:
This is now reading the size out of the header of the file which is good but it should also validate that the file is big enough to have this much data in it, otherwise it's possible to read beyond the end of the firmware file (eg, if it got truncated somehow). Previously the code used the size of the file read from disk so that wasn't an issue.
Thanks for quick comment. Can this case cover by below line?
- if (fw->size < MAX98390_DSM_PARAM_MIN_SIZE) {
dev_err(component->dev,"param fw is invalid.\n");goto err_alloc;- }
No, that doesn't cover all of it - the case I'm concerned about is the case where we've got enough data for the header but the payload is truncated. You need a check that param_size + _PAYLOAD_OFFSET is less than fw->size as well.
-----Original Message----- From: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 8:43 PM To: Steve Lee SteveS.Lee@maximintegrated.com Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com; perex@perex.cz; tiwai@suse.com; ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com; geert@linux-m68k.org; rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; shumingf@realtek.com; srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org; krzk@kernel.org; dmurphy@ti.com; jack.yu@realtek.com; nuno.sa@analog.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; ryan.lee.maxim@gmail.com; Ryan Lee RyanS.Lee@maximintegrated.com; steves.lee.maxim@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98390: Fix potential crash during param fw loading
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 11:37:44AM +0000, Steve Lee wrote:
This is now reading the size out of the header of the file which is good but it should also validate that the file is big enough to have this much data in it, otherwise it's possible to read beyond the end of the firmware file (eg, if it got truncated somehow). Previously the code used the size of the file read from disk so that wasn't an issue.
Thanks for quick comment. Can this case cover by below line?
- if (fw->size < MAX98390_DSM_PARAM_MIN_SIZE) {
dev_err(component->dev,"param fw is invalid.\n");goto err_alloc;- }
No, that doesn't cover all of it - the case I'm concerned about is the case where we've got enough data for the header but the payload is truncated. You need a check that param_size + _PAYLOAD_OFFSET is less than fw->size as well.
Yes, I will update this and good enough.
participants (3)
-
Mark Brown -
Steve Lee -
Takashi Iwai