[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: ssm2518: Fix off-by-one error by ffs()
ffs() returns the bit position from 1, while the ssm2158 driver code assumes it being 0-based. Also, the bit mask computation of the two channel slots are incorrect; it must have worked just casually.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de ---
I found it casully while checking ab8500 bug. The patch is untested, so please review/test first, and give Cc to stable if needed.
sound/soc/codecs/ssm2518.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/ssm2518.c b/sound/soc/codecs/ssm2518.c index 95aed552139a..cc8debce752f 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/ssm2518.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/ssm2518.c @@ -549,13 +549,13 @@ static int ssm2518_set_tdm_slot(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, unsigned int tx_mask, right_slot = 0; } else { /* We assume the left channel < right channel */ - left_slot = ffs(tx_mask); - tx_mask &= ~(1 << tx_mask); + left_slot = __ffs(tx_mask); + tx_mask &= ~(1 << left_slot); if (tx_mask == 0) { right_slot = left_slot; } else { - right_slot = ffs(tx_mask); - tx_mask &= ~(1 << tx_mask); + right_slot = __ffs(tx_mask); + tx_mask &= ~(1 << right_slot); } }
On 12/23/2013 11:42 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
ffs() returns the bit position from 1, while the ssm2158 driver code assumes it being 0-based. Also, the bit mask computation of the two channel slots are incorrect; it must have worked just casually.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de
Looks good, thanks.
Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen lars@metafoo.de
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:42:55AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
ffs() returns the bit position from 1, while the ssm2158 driver code assumes it being 0-based. Also, the bit mask computation of the two channel slots are incorrect; it must have worked just casually.
Applied, thanks.
participants (3)
-
Lars-Peter Clausen
-
Mark Brown
-
Takashi Iwai