[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Remove unused control_data and mutex fields from struct alc5632_priv
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel.lin@gmail.com --- sound/soc/codecs/alc5632.c | 4 ---- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/alc5632.c b/sound/soc/codecs/alc5632.c index ee6a497..bfb48ba 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/alc5632.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/alc5632.c @@ -68,8 +68,6 @@ static const u16 alc5632_reg_defaults[] = { /* codec private data */ struct alc5632_priv { enum snd_soc_control_type control_type; - void *control_data; - struct mutex mutex; u8 id; unsigned int sysclk; }; @@ -1092,9 +1090,7 @@ static int alc5632_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client, }
i2c_set_clientdata(client, alc5632); - alc5632->control_data = client; alc5632->control_type = SND_SOC_I2C; - mutex_init(&alc5632->mutex);
ret = snd_soc_register_codec(&client->dev, &soc_codec_device_alc5632, &alc5632_dai, 1);
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 05:56, Axel Lin axel.lin@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel.lin@gmail.com
sound/soc/codecs/alc5632.c | 4 ---- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/alc5632.c b/sound/soc/codecs/alc5632.c index ee6a497..bfb48ba 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/alc5632.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/alc5632.c @@ -68,8 +68,6 @@ static const u16 alc5632_reg_defaults[] = { /* codec private data */ struct alc5632_priv { enum snd_soc_control_type control_type;
- void *control_data;
- struct mutex mutex;
u8 id; unsigned int sysclk; }; @@ -1092,9 +1090,7 @@ static int alc5632_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client, }
i2c_set_clientdata(client, alc5632);
- alc5632->control_data = client;
alc5632->control_type = SND_SOC_I2C;
- mutex_init(&alc5632->mutex);
ret = snd_soc_register_codec(&client->dev, &soc_codec_device_alc5632, &alc5632_dai, 1); -- 1.7.5.4
Thanks,
Mark, Liam do I need to sign Acked-Off-By on this type of patch?
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 23:21, Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 09:47:59PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
Mark, Liam do I need to sign Acked-Off-By on this type of patch?
You don't have to but if you've reviewed patches that haven't yet been applied it's always helpful to say so.
Ok, in this case, I reviewed it and tested :)
Acked-off-by: Leon Romanovsky leon@leon.nu
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:56:28AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel.lin@gmail.com
Applied, thanks.
participants (3)
-
Axel Lin
-
Leon Romanovsky
-
Mark Brown