At Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:55:39 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:

According to the ALC268 datasheet, there is actually an input amplifier on node 0x1d, even though this is not exposed in the codec proc file.

Signed-off-by: David Henningsson david.henningsson@canonical.com

Thanks, applied (after sorting the fixup_list item in the order of codec id numbers).

Takashi

---

hda-spec.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

Relevant alsa info: alc268-toshiba-tecra-s11-m11--nvidia--ccert-201002-5346

diff --git a/hda-spec.c b/hda-spec.c index f1b03b4..dd43ee9 100644 --- a/hda-spec.c +++ b/hda-spec.c @@ -386,6 +386,20 @@ static void fixup_via_mixer(struct xhda_codec *codec) node->node[node->num_nodes++] = 0x08; }

+static void fixup_alc268_beep(struct xhda_codec *codec) +{

• struct xhda_node *node = find_node(codec, 0x1d);
• if (!node)

• return;
  

• node->wcaps |= (1 << 1); /* AMP-in present */
• node->amp_in_caps.ofs = 0x0c;
• node->amp_in_caps.nsteps = 0x0c;
• node->amp_in_caps.stepsize = 0x07;
• node->amp_in_caps.mute = 0;
• node->amp_in_caps.override = 1;

+}

struct fixup_list { unsigned int vendor_id; void (*func)(struct xhda_codec *); @@ -397,6 +411,7 @@ static struct fixup_list fixups[] = { { 0x11060438, fixup_via_mixer }, { 0x11064438, fixup_via_mixer }, { 0x11060448, fixup_via_mixer },

• { 0x10ec0268, fixup_alc268_beep }, { }

};

-- 1.7.9.5