Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 5/5] ASoC: mxs: correct 'direction' of device_prep_dma_cyclic
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 15:47 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
The commit 49920bc (dmaengine: add new enum dma_transfer_direction) changes the type of parameter 'direction' of device_prep_dma_cyclic from dma_data_direction to dma_transfer_direction.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org
sound/soc/mxs/mxs-pcm.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-pcm.c b/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-pcm.c index 0e12f4e..105f42a 100644 --- a/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-pcm.c @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static int snd_mxs_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, iprtd->period_bytes * iprtd->periods, iprtd->period_bytes, substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK ?
DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
DMA_MEM_TO_DEV : DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
Has this been applied in soc tree? I don't see it in linux-next or do you want this to go thru slave-dma?
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 09:37:00PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
Has this been applied in soc tree? I don't see it in linux-next or do you want this to go thru slave-dma?
I reverted it, it needs to go with the commit that introduces the new API otherwise it breaks bisection.
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 16:28 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 09:37:00PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
Has this been applied in soc tree? I don't see it in linux-next or do you want this to go thru slave-dma?
I reverted it, it needs to go with the commit that introduces the new API otherwise it breaks bisection.
Okay thanks,
Those are is in my next so I will apply this one to my next as well.
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown -
Vinod Koul