[PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
Cleanup path for sof_prepare_widgets_in_path() should check if unprepare callback exists before calling it, instead it checks if it does not exist. Fix the check.
Fixes: 370014c8197a ("ASoC: SOF: Add a prepare op to IPC topology widget ops") Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com --- sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c b/sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c index cd41d0599cef..789d0a1f1a77 100644 --- a/sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c +++ b/sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ sof_prepare_widgets_in_path(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, struct snd_soc_dapm_widget p->walking = false; if (ret < 0) { /* unprepare the source widget */ - if (!widget_ops[widget->id].ipc_unprepare && swidget->prepared) { + if (widget_ops[widget->id].ipc_unprepare && swidget->prepared) { widget_ops[widget->id].ipc_unprepare(swidget); swidget->prepared = false; }
On Thu, 2022-06-02 at 15:57 +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
Cleanup path for sof_prepare_widgets_in_path() should check if unprepare callback exists before calling it, instead it checks if it does not exist. Fix the check.
Fixes: 370014c8197a ("ASoC: SOF: Add a prepare op to IPC topology widget ops") Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński < amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
LGTM. Thanks for the fix. Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c b/sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c index cd41d0599cef..789d0a1f1a77 100644 --- a/sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c +++ b/sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ sof_prepare_widgets_in_path(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, struct snd_soc_dapm_widget p->walking = false; if (ret < 0) { /* unprepare the source widget */
if (!widget_ops[widget-
id].ipc_unprepare && swidget->prepared) {
if (widget_ops[widget-
id].ipc_unprepare && swidget->prepared) {
widget_ops[widget-
id].ipc_unprepare(swidget);
swidget->prepared = false; }
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 03:57:57PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
Cleanup path for sof_prepare_widgets_in_path() should check if unprepare callback exists before calling it, instead it checks if it does not exist. Fix the check.
Fixes: 370014c8197a ("ASoC: SOF: Add a prepare op to IPC topology widget ops")
This commit does not exist.
On 6/6/22 06:31, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 03:57:57PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
Cleanup path for sof_prepare_widgets_in_path() should check if unprepare callback exists before calling it, instead it checks if it does not exist. Fix the check.
Fixes: 370014c8197a ("ASoC: SOF: Add a prepare op to IPC topology widget ops")
This commit does not exist.
Indeed, this SHA was for the SOF tree, the upstream version is this:
66344c6d92113 ("ASoC: SOF: Add a prepare op to IPC topology widget ops")
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 15:57:57 +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
Cleanup path for sof_prepare_widgets_in_path() should check if unprepare callback exists before calling it, instead it checks if it does not exist. Fix the check.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: SOF: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference commit: 2fe08216fda33bbc1f80133b8fd560ffd094b987
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (4)
-
Amadeusz Sławiński
-
Mark Brown
-
Pierre-Louis Bossart
-
Ranjani Sridharan