[PATCH v2 0/3] ASoC: soc-pcm: cleanup code
Hi Mark
These are v2 of soc-pcm cleanup code. v1 had 6 patches, but I separated into 2 parts. This is 1st part of it.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87360c99kb.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Kuninori Morimoto (3): ASoC: soc-pcm: move dpcm_set_fe_update_state() ASoC: soc-pcm: add dpcm_set_be_update_state() ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_pcm_set_dai_params()
sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
From: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
This patch moves dpcm_set_fe_update_state() to top side. This is prepare for cleanup soc-pcm.c
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index a253c9f918e1..1cc8d0b6ec3d 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -203,6 +203,28 @@ static inline void dpcm_remove_debugfs_state(struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm) } #endif
+/* Set FE's runtime_update state; the state is protected via PCM stream lock + * for avoiding the race with trigger callback. + * If the state is unset and a trigger is pending while the previous operation, + * process the pending trigger action here. + */ +static int dpcm_fe_dai_do_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd); +static void dpcm_set_fe_update_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, + int stream, enum snd_soc_dpcm_update state) +{ + struct snd_pcm_substream *substream = + snd_soc_dpcm_get_substream(fe, stream); + + snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream); + if (state == SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO && fe->dpcm[stream].trigger_pending) { + dpcm_fe_dai_do_trigger(substream, + fe->dpcm[stream].trigger_pending - 1); + fe->dpcm[stream].trigger_pending = 0; + } + fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = state; + snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream); +} + /** * snd_soc_runtime_action() - Increment/Decrement active count for * PCM runtime components @@ -1710,29 +1732,6 @@ static void dpcm_set_fe_runtime(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) &runtime->hw.rate_min, &runtime->hw.rate_max); }
-static int dpcm_fe_dai_do_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd); - -/* Set FE's runtime_update state; the state is protected via PCM stream lock - * for avoiding the race with trigger callback. - * If the state is unset and a trigger is pending while the previous operation, - * process the pending trigger action here. - */ -static void dpcm_set_fe_update_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, - int stream, enum snd_soc_dpcm_update state) -{ - struct snd_pcm_substream *substream = - snd_soc_dpcm_get_substream(fe, stream); - - snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream); - if (state == SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO && fe->dpcm[stream].trigger_pending) { - dpcm_fe_dai_do_trigger(substream, - fe->dpcm[stream].trigger_pending - 1); - fe->dpcm[stream].trigger_pending = 0; - } - fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = state; - snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream); -} - static int dpcm_apply_symmetry(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream, int stream) {
From: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
soc-pcm has dpcm_set_fe_update_state() to update FE's runtime_update (except dpcm_fe_dai_do_trigger() which needs to update it without it). OTOH, it doesn't have BE's update function.
O: dpcm_set_fe_update_state() X: dpcm_set_be_update_state()
This patch add BE's dpcm_set_fe_update_state()
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index 1cc8d0b6ec3d..54b460f08373 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -225,6 +225,12 @@ static void dpcm_set_fe_update_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream); }
+static void dpcm_set_be_update_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *be, + int stream, enum snd_soc_dpcm_update state) +{ + be->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = state; +} + /** * snd_soc_runtime_action() - Increment/Decrement active count for * PCM runtime components @@ -1357,7 +1363,7 @@ static int dpcm_prune_paths(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream, stream ? "capture" : "playback", dpcm->be->dai_link->name, fe->dai_link->name); dpcm->state = SND_SOC_DPCM_LINK_STATE_FREE; - dpcm->be->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_BE; + dpcm_set_be_update_state(dpcm->be, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_BE); prune++; }
@@ -1412,7 +1418,7 @@ static int dpcm_add_paths(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream, continue;
/* new */ - be->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_BE; + dpcm_set_be_update_state(be, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_BE); new++; }
@@ -1440,8 +1446,7 @@ void dpcm_clear_pending_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
spin_lock_irqsave(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags); for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) - dpcm->be->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = - SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO; + dpcm_set_be_update_state(dpcm->be, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags); }
From: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Getting rate/channels/sample_bits from param needs fixed method. This patch adds new soc_pcm_set_dai_params() and replace existing code.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index 54b460f08373..6e9f14d482ab 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -329,6 +329,20 @@ int dpcm_dapm_stream_event(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int dir, return 0; }
+static void soc_pcm_set_dai_params(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, + struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params) +{ + if (params) { + dai->rate = params_rate(params); + dai->channels = params_channels(params); + dai->sample_bits = snd_pcm_format_physical_width(params_format(params)); + } else { + dai->rate = 0; + dai->channels = 0; + dai->sample_bits = 0; + } +} + static int soc_pcm_apply_symmetry(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, struct snd_soc_dai *soc_dai) { @@ -390,13 +404,12 @@ static int soc_pcm_params_symmetry(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params) { struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd = asoc_substream_to_rtd(substream); + struct snd_soc_dai d; struct snd_soc_dai *dai; struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai; - unsigned int rate, channels, sample_bits, symmetry, i; + unsigned int symmetry, i;
- rate = params_rate(params); - channels = params_channels(params); - sample_bits = snd_pcm_format_physical_width(params_format(params)); + soc_pcm_set_dai_params(&d, params);
/* reject unmatched parameters when applying symmetry */ symmetry = rtd->dai_link->symmetric_rates; @@ -406,9 +419,9 @@ static int soc_pcm_params_symmetry(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
if (symmetry) { for_each_rtd_cpu_dais(rtd, i, cpu_dai) { - if (cpu_dai->rate && cpu_dai->rate != rate) { + if (cpu_dai->rate && cpu_dai->rate != d.rate) { dev_err(rtd->dev, "ASoC: unmatched rate symmetry: %d - %d\n", - cpu_dai->rate, rate); + cpu_dai->rate, d.rate); return -EINVAL; } } @@ -422,9 +435,9 @@ static int soc_pcm_params_symmetry(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, if (symmetry) { for_each_rtd_cpu_dais(rtd, i, cpu_dai) { if (cpu_dai->channels && - cpu_dai->channels != channels) { + cpu_dai->channels != d.channels) { dev_err(rtd->dev, "ASoC: unmatched channel symmetry: %d - %d\n", - cpu_dai->channels, channels); + cpu_dai->channels, d.channels); return -EINVAL; } } @@ -438,9 +451,9 @@ static int soc_pcm_params_symmetry(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, if (symmetry) { for_each_rtd_cpu_dais(rtd, i, cpu_dai) { if (cpu_dai->sample_bits && - cpu_dai->sample_bits != sample_bits) { + cpu_dai->sample_bits != d.sample_bits) { dev_err(rtd->dev, "ASoC: unmatched sample bits symmetry: %d - %d\n", - cpu_dai->sample_bits, sample_bits); + cpu_dai->sample_bits, d.sample_bits); return -EINVAL; } } @@ -898,11 +911,8 @@ static int soc_pcm_hw_clean(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int rollback) for_each_rtd_dais(rtd, i, dai) { int active = snd_soc_dai_stream_active(dai, substream->stream);
- if (snd_soc_dai_active(dai) == 1) { - dai->rate = 0; - dai->channels = 0; - dai->sample_bits = 0; - } + if (snd_soc_dai_active(dai) == 1) + soc_pcm_set_dai_params(dai, NULL);
if (active == 1) snd_soc_dai_digital_mute(dai, 1, substream->stream); @@ -999,11 +1009,7 @@ static int soc_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, if(ret < 0) goto out;
- codec_dai->rate = params_rate(&codec_params); - codec_dai->channels = params_channels(&codec_params); - codec_dai->sample_bits = snd_pcm_format_physical_width( - params_format(&codec_params)); - + soc_pcm_set_dai_params(codec_dai, &codec_params); snd_soc_dapm_update_dai(substream, &codec_params, codec_dai); }
@@ -1020,11 +1026,7 @@ static int soc_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, goto out;
/* store the parameters for each DAI */ - cpu_dai->rate = params_rate(params); - cpu_dai->channels = params_channels(params); - cpu_dai->sample_bits = - snd_pcm_format_physical_width(params_format(params)); - + soc_pcm_set_dai_params(cpu_dai, params); snd_soc_dapm_update_dai(substream, params, cpu_dai); }
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:34:49AM +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
These are v2 of soc-pcm cleanup code. v1 had 6 patches, but I separated into 2 parts. This is 1st part of it.
I actually already queued patches 1-4 of v1 - it's testing ATM. Are there any changes here or is it just splitting things up?
Hi Mark
These are v2 of soc-pcm cleanup code. v1 had 6 patches, but I separated into 2 parts. This is 1st part of it.
I actually already queued patches 1-4 of v1 - it's testing ATM. Are there any changes here or is it just splitting things up?
1-3 are same, and I updated 4-6. But OK. I will check latest branch
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
participants (2)
-
Kuninori Morimoto -
Mark Brown