When snd_usb_mixer_add_control() fails, elem needs to be freed just like when snd_ctl_new1() fails. However, current code is returning directly and ends up leaking memory.

Can an imperative wording be preferred for the change description?

…

+++ b/sound/usb/mixer_scarlett_gen2.c @@ -964,8 +964,10 @@ static int scarlett2_add_new_ctl(struct usb_mixer_interface *mixer, strlcpy(kctl->id.name, name, sizeof(kctl->id.name));

err = snd_usb_mixer_add_control(&elem->head, kctl);

• if (err < 0)

• if (err < 0) {

• kfree(elem);
  

  return err;
• }

…

I propose to add a jump target so that a bit of common exception handling code can be better reused in this function implementation.

Regards, Markus