[PATCH] ASoC: fsl_esai: Remove expensive print in irq handler
Use dev_dbg instead of dev_err in irq handler, the dev_err is expensive, we don't need the message to be printed everytime, which is almost a debug option.
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@nxp.com --- sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c index c7a49d03463a..453392a9cd68 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c @@ -94,10 +94,10 @@ static irqreturn_t esai_isr(int irq, void *devid) dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "isr: Transmission Initialized\n");
if (esr & ESAI_ESR_RFF_MASK) - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "isr: Receiving overrun\n"); + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "isr: Receiving overrun\n");
if (esr & ESAI_ESR_TFE_MASK) - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "isr: Transmission underrun\n"); + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "isr: Transmission underrun\n");
if (esr & ESAI_ESR_TLS_MASK) dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "isr: Just transmitted the last slot\n");
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:41:23PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
Use dev_dbg instead of dev_err in irq handler, the dev_err is expensive, we don't need the message to be printed everytime, which is almost a debug option.
if (esr & ESAI_ESR_RFF_MASK)
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "isr: Receiving overrun\n");
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "isr: Receiving overrun\n");
if (esr & ESAI_ESR_TFE_MASK)
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "isr: Transmission underrun\n");
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "isr: Transmission underrun\n");
These are error messages which would suggest a problem that'd lead to data corruption, it seems bad not to try to flag that to the user - surely we've got bigger problems than performance if this happens? Perhaps convert to a ratelimited print if the issue is that when errors happen they happen a lot?
Hi
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:53 PM Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:41:23PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
Use dev_dbg instead of dev_err in irq handler, the dev_err is expensive, we don't need the message to be printed everytime, which is almost a debug option.
if (esr & ESAI_ESR_RFF_MASK)
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "isr: Receiving overrun\n");
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "isr: Receiving overrun\n"); if (esr & ESAI_ESR_TFE_MASK)
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "isr: Transmission underrun\n");
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "isr: Transmission underrun\n");
These are error messages which would suggest a problem that'd lead to data corruption, it seems bad not to try to flag that to the user - surely we've got bigger problems than performance if this happens? Perhaps convert to a ratelimited print if the issue is that when errors happen they happen a lot?
Thanks for review, I will rethink about this.
best regards wang shengjiu
participants (3)
-
Mark Brown
-
Shengjiu Wang
-
Shengjiu Wang