[PATCH] ASoC: mxs-saif: Add variable dev to simplify code
Add variable 'dev' to make the code cleaner in the function mxs_saif_probe(). And now that the function mxs_saif_mclk_init() have defined the variables 'ret' as the error returned value, then it should be used instead in this place.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com Signed-off-by: Tang Bin tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com --- sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c b/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c index dc197883e..f4e441183 100644 --- a/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c +++ b/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c @@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ static int mxs_saif_mclk_init(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret == -EEXIST) return 0; dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register mclk: %d\n", ret); - return PTR_ERR(clk); + return ret; }
ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk); @@ -732,6 +732,7 @@ static int mxs_saif_mclk_init(struct platform_device *pdev) static int mxs_saif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct mxs_saif *saif; int irq, ret; struct device_node *master; @@ -739,7 +740,7 @@ static int mxs_saif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!np) return -EINVAL;
- saif = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*saif), GFP_KERNEL); + saif = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*saif), GFP_KERNEL); if (!saif) return -ENOMEM;
@@ -750,7 +751,7 @@ static int mxs_saif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) saif->id = ret;
if (saif->id >= ARRAY_SIZE(mxs_saif)) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "get wrong saif id\n"); + dev_err(dev, "get wrong saif id\n"); return -EINVAL; }
@@ -770,18 +771,17 @@ static int mxs_saif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) saif->master_id = ret;
if (saif->master_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(mxs_saif)) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "get wrong master id\n"); + dev_err(dev, "get wrong master id\n"); return -EINVAL; } }
mxs_saif[saif->id] = saif;
- saif->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); + saif->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL); if (IS_ERR(saif->clk)) { ret = PTR_ERR(saif->clk); - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot get the clock: %d\n", - ret); + dev_err(dev, "Cannot get the clock: %d\n", ret); return ret; }
@@ -793,11 +793,11 @@ static int mxs_saif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (irq < 0) return irq;
- saif->dev = &pdev->dev; - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, mxs_saif_irq, 0, - dev_name(&pdev->dev), saif); + saif->dev = dev; + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, mxs_saif_irq, 0, + dev_name(dev), saif); if (ret) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request irq\n"); + dev_err(dev, "failed to request irq\n"); return ret; }
@@ -807,19 +807,19 @@ static int mxs_saif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (saif->id == 0) { ret = mxs_saif_mclk_init(pdev); if (ret) - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to init clocks\n"); + dev_warn(dev, "failed to init clocks\n"); }
- ret = devm_snd_soc_register_component(&pdev->dev, &mxs_saif_component, + ret = devm_snd_soc_register_component(dev, &mxs_saif_component, &mxs_saif_dai, 1); if (ret) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "register DAI failed\n"); + dev_err(dev, "register DAI failed\n"); return ret; }
- ret = mxs_pcm_platform_register(&pdev->dev); + ret = mxs_pcm_platform_register(dev); if (ret) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "register PCM failed: %d\n", ret); + dev_err(dev, "register PCM failed: %d\n", ret); return ret; }
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:40:23 +0800, Tang Bin wrote:
Add variable 'dev' to make the code cleaner in the function mxs_saif_probe(). And now that the function mxs_saif_mclk_init() have defined the variables 'ret' as the error returned value, then it should be used instead in this place.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com Signed-off-by: Tang Bin tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com
[...]
Applied to
local tree regulator/for-5.7
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: mxs-saif: Add variable dev to simplify code (no commit info)
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown
-
Tang Bin