[alsa-devel] [PATCH v6] ASoC: dapm: add code to configure dai link parameters
dai-link params for codec-codec links were fixed. The fixed link between codec and another chip which may be another codec, baseband, bluetooth codec etc may require run time configuaration changes. This change provides an optional alsa control to select one of the params from a list of params.
Signed-off-by: Nikesh Oswal nikesh@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com --- include/sound/soc-dapm.h | 3 + include/sound/soc.h | 1 + sound/soc/soc-core.c | 6 +- sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 4 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/sound/soc-dapm.h b/include/sound/soc-dapm.h index aac04ff..20863f2 100644 --- a/include/sound/soc-dapm.h +++ b/include/sound/soc-dapm.h @@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_link_dai_widgets(struct snd_soc_card *card); void snd_soc_dapm_connect_dai_link_widgets(struct snd_soc_card *card); int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params, + unsigned int num_params, struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *source, struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *sink);
@@ -532,6 +533,8 @@ struct snd_soc_dapm_widget { void *priv; /* widget specific data */ struct regulator *regulator; /* attached regulator */ const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params; /* params for dai links */ + unsigned int num_params; /* number of params for dai links */ + unsigned int params_select; /* currently selected param for dai link */
/* dapm control */ int reg; /* negative reg = no direct dapm */ diff --git a/include/sound/soc.h b/include/sound/soc.h index c83a334..a97848f 100644 --- a/include/sound/soc.h +++ b/include/sound/soc.h @@ -926,6 +926,7 @@ struct snd_soc_dai_link { int be_id; /* optional ID for machine driver BE identification */
const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params; + unsigned int num_params;
unsigned int dai_fmt; /* format to set on init */
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c index d074aa9..93850be 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c @@ -1436,7 +1436,8 @@ static int soc_link_dai_widgets(struct snd_soc_card *card, capture_w = cpu_dai->capture_widget; if (play_w && capture_w) { ret = snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(card, dai_link->params, - capture_w, play_w); + dai_link->num_params, capture_w, + play_w); if (ret != 0) { dev_err(card->dev, "ASoC: Can't link %s to %s: %d\n", play_w->name, capture_w->name, ret); @@ -1448,7 +1449,8 @@ static int soc_link_dai_widgets(struct snd_soc_card *card, capture_w = codec_dai->capture_widget; if (play_w && capture_w) { ret = snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(card, dai_link->params, - capture_w, play_w); + dai_link->num_params, capture_w, + play_w); if (ret != 0) { dev_err(card->dev, "ASoC: Can't link %s to %s: %d\n", play_w->name, capture_w->name, ret); diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c index 177bd86..5f7a342 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c @@ -750,6 +750,36 @@ static int dapm_new_pga(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w) return 0; }
+/* create new dapm dai link control */ +static int dapm_new_dai_link(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w) +{ + int i, ret; + struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol; + struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm = w->dapm; + struct snd_card *card = dapm->card->snd_card; + + /* skip control creation for links with 1 config */ + if (w->num_params == 1) + return 0; + + /* add kcontrol */ + for (i = 0; i < w->num_kcontrols; i++) { + kcontrol = snd_soc_cnew(&w->kcontrol_news[i], w, + w->name, NULL); + ret = snd_ctl_add(card, kcontrol); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dapm->dev, + "ASoC: failed to add widget %s dapm kcontrol %s: %d\n", + w->name, w->kcontrol_news[i].name, ret); + return ret; + } + kcontrol->private_data = w; + w->kcontrols[i] = kcontrol; + } + + return 0; +} + /* reset 'walked' bit for each dapm path */ static void dapm_clear_walk_output(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm, struct list_head *sink) @@ -2701,6 +2731,9 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets(struct snd_soc_card *card) case snd_soc_dapm_out_drv: dapm_new_pga(w); break; + case snd_soc_dapm_dai_link: + dapm_new_dai_link(w); + break; default: break; } @@ -3185,6 +3218,9 @@ static int snd_soc_dai_link_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w, source = source_p->source->priv; sink = sink_p->sink->priv;
+ /* Select the configuration set by alsa control */ + config += w->params_select; + /* Be a little careful as we don't want to overflow the mask array */ if (config->formats) { fmt = ffs(config->formats) - 1; @@ -3253,8 +3289,35 @@ out: return ret; }
+static int snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, + struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol) +{ + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); + + ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = w->params_select; + + return 0; +} + +static int snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, + struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol) +{ + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); + + if (ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] == w->params_select) + return 0; + + if (ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] >= w->num_params) + return -EINVAL; + + w->params_select = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0]; + + return 0; +} + int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params, + unsigned int num_params, struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *source, struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *sink) { @@ -3262,14 +3325,48 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w; size_t len; char *link_name; - int ret; + int ret, count; + unsigned long private_value; + const char **w_param_text; + struct soc_enum w_param_enum[] = { + SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(0, 0, 0, NULL), + }; + struct snd_kcontrol_new kcontrol_dai_link[] = { + SOC_ENUM_EXT(NULL, w_param_enum[0], + snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_get, + snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_put), + }; + const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *config = params; + + w_param_text = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!w_param_text) + return -ENOMEM;
len = strlen(source->name) + strlen(sink->name) + 2; link_name = devm_kzalloc(card->dev, len, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!link_name) - return -ENOMEM; + if (!link_name) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto outfree_w_param; + } + snprintf(link_name, len, "%s-%s", source->name, sink->name);
+ for (count = 0 ; count < num_params; count++) { + if (!config->stream_name) + dev_warn(card->dapm.dev, + "ASoC: anonymous config %d for dai link %s\n", + count, link_name); + w_param_text[count] = kmemdup((void *)(config->stream_name), + strlen(config->stream_name) + 1, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!w_param_text[count]) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto outfree_link_name; + } + config++; + } + w_param_enum[0].items = num_params; + w_param_enum[0].texts = w_param_text; + memset(&template, 0, sizeof(template)); template.reg = SND_SOC_NOPM; template.id = snd_soc_dapm_dai_link; @@ -3277,6 +3374,25 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, template.event = snd_soc_dai_link_event; template.event_flags = SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU | SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMU | SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMD; + template.num_kcontrols = 1; + private_value = + (unsigned long) kmemdup((void *)(kcontrol_dai_link[0].private_value), + sizeof(struct soc_enum), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!private_value) { + dev_err(card->dev, "ASoC: Failed to create control for %s widget\n", + link_name); + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto outfree_link_name; + } + kcontrol_dai_link[0].private_value = private_value; + template.kcontrol_news = kmemdup(&kcontrol_dai_link[0], + sizeof(struct snd_kcontrol_new), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!template.kcontrol_news) { + dev_err(card->dev, "ASoC: Failed to create control for %s widget\n", + link_name); + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto outfree_private_value; + }
dev_dbg(card->dev, "ASoC: adding %s widget\n", link_name);
@@ -3284,15 +3400,32 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, if (!w) { dev_err(card->dev, "ASoC: Failed to create %s widget\n", link_name); - return -ENOMEM; + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto outfree_kcontrol_news; }
w->params = params; + w->num_params = num_params;
ret = snd_soc_dapm_add_path(&card->dapm, source, w, NULL, NULL); if (ret) - return ret; + goto outfree_w; return snd_soc_dapm_add_path(&card->dapm, w, sink, NULL, NULL); + +outfree_w: + kfree(w); +outfree_kcontrol_news: + kfree(template.kcontrol_news); +outfree_private_value: + kfree((void *)private_value); +outfree_link_name: + kfree(link_name); +outfree_w_param: + for (count = 0 ; count < num_params; count++) + kfree(w_param_text[count]); + kfree(w_param_text); + + return ret; }
int snd_soc_dapm_new_dai_widgets(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 05:17:15PM +0100, Nikesh Oswal wrote:
dai-link params for codec-codec links were fixed. The fixed link between codec and another chip which may be another codec, baseband, bluetooth codec etc may require run time configuaration changes. This change provides an optional alsa control to select one of the params from a list of params.
Has anything changed since the previous version? I've postponed reviewing that until after the merge window given the way you were ignoring feedback and the approach of the merge window, is this a new version or just a reposting.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 05:49:59PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 05:17:15PM +0100, Nikesh Oswal wrote:
dai-link params for codec-codec links were fixed. The fixed link between codec and another chip which may be another codec, baseband, bluetooth codec etc may require run time configuaration changes. This change provides an optional alsa control to select one of the params from a list of params.
Has anything changed since the previous version? I've postponed reviewing that until after the merge window given the way you were ignoring feedback and the approach of the merge window, is this a new version or just a reposting.
Since it was not merged or reviewed since long, I just did a reposting
of previous version of the patch
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:39:45AM +0100, Nikesh Oswal wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 05:49:59PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Has anything changed since the previous version? I've postponed reviewing that until after the merge window given the way you were ignoring feedback and the approach of the merge window, is this a new version or just a reposting.
Since it was not merged or reviewed since long, I just did a reposting
of previous version of the patch
OK. *Please* try to configure your e-mail client so that it formats e-mails in a normal fashion for posting on the lists, I'm sure your colleagues can help you with that. The above looks like your reply is actually part of some quoted text rather than a reply.
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown
-
Nikesh Oswal