[PATCH] ASoC: sam9g20_wm8731: Simplify some error message
dev_err_probe() already prints the error code in a human readable way, so there is no need to duplicate it as a numerical value at the end of the message.
Fixes: 29f4078f777f ("ASoC: sam9g20_wm8731: Use dev_err_probe() for snd_soc_register_card()") Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr --- sound/soc/atmel/sam9g20_wm8731.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/atmel/sam9g20_wm8731.c b/sound/soc/atmel/sam9g20_wm8731.c index 4d25fb61c652..1430642c8433 100644 --- a/sound/soc/atmel/sam9g20_wm8731.c +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/sam9g20_wm8731.c @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int at91sam9g20ek_audio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret = snd_soc_register_card(card); if (ret) { dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, - "snd_soc_register_card() failed: %d\n", ret); + "snd_soc_register_card() failed\n"); goto err; }
On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 07:45:48 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
dev_err_probe() already prints the error code in a human readable way, so there is no need to duplicate it as a numerical value at the end of the message.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: sam9g20_wm8731: Simplify some error message commit: 7d67657cb472a80d54457362bc421f2b57ee250b
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Christophe JAILLET -
Mark Brown