[PATCH] ASoC: qcom: q6prm: fix incorrect clk_root passed to ADSP
The second to last argument is clk_root (root of the clock), however the code called q6prm_request_lpass_clock() with clk_attr instead (copy-paste error). This effectively was passing value of 1 as root clock which worked on some of the SoCs (e.g. SM8450) but fails on others, depending on the ADSP. For example on SM8550 this "1" as root clock is not accepted and results in errors coming from ADSP.
Fixes: 2f20640491ed ("ASoC: qdsp6: qdsp6: q6prm: handle clk disable correctly") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org --- sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6prm.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6prm.c b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6prm.c index 8aa1a213bfb7..c1dc5bae715a 100644 --- a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6prm.c +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6prm.c @@ -183,9 +183,9 @@ int q6prm_set_lpass_clock(struct device *dev, int clk_id, int clk_attr, int clk_ unsigned int freq) { if (freq) - return q6prm_request_lpass_clock(dev, clk_id, clk_attr, clk_attr, freq); + return q6prm_request_lpass_clock(dev, clk_id, clk_attr, clk_root, freq);
- return q6prm_release_lpass_clock(dev, clk_id, clk_attr, clk_attr, freq); + return q6prm_release_lpass_clock(dev, clk_id, clk_attr, clk_root, freq); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(q6prm_set_lpass_clock);
On 02/03/2023 12:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
The second to last argument is clk_root (root of the clock), however the code called q6prm_request_lpass_clock() with clk_attr instead (copy-paste error). This effectively was passing value of 1 as root clock which worked on some of the SoCs (e.g. SM8450) but fails on others, depending on the ADSP. For example on SM8550 this "1" as root clock is not accepted and results in errors coming from ADSP.
Fixes: 2f20640491ed ("ASoC: qdsp6: qdsp6: q6prm: handle clk disable correctly") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Nice Find, Tested on sc8280xp
Reviewed-by: Srinivas Kandagatla srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
--srini
sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6prm.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6prm.c b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6prm.c index 8aa1a213bfb7..c1dc5bae715a 100644 --- a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6prm.c +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6prm.c @@ -183,9 +183,9 @@ int q6prm_set_lpass_clock(struct device *dev, int clk_id, int clk_attr, int clk_ unsigned int freq) { if (freq)
return q6prm_request_lpass_clock(dev, clk_id, clk_attr, clk_attr, freq);
return q6prm_request_lpass_clock(dev, clk_id, clk_attr, clk_root, freq);
- return q6prm_release_lpass_clock(dev, clk_id, clk_attr, clk_attr, freq);
- return q6prm_release_lpass_clock(dev, clk_id, clk_attr, clk_root, freq); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(q6prm_set_lpass_clock);
On Thu, 02 Mar 2023 13:29:08 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
The second to last argument is clk_root (root of the clock), however the code called q6prm_request_lpass_clock() with clk_attr instead (copy-paste error). This effectively was passing value of 1 as root clock which worked on some of the SoCs (e.g. SM8450) but fails on others, depending on the ADSP. For example on SM8550 this "1" as root clock is not accepted and results in errors coming from ADSP.
[...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: qcom: q6prm: fix incorrect clk_root passed to ADSP commit: 65882134bc622a1e57bd5928ac588855ea2e3ddd
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (3)
-
Krzysztof Kozlowski
-
Mark Brown
-
Srinivas Kandagatla