I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu chuansheng.liu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Baole Ni baolex.ni@intel.com --- sound/pci/fm801.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/fm801.c b/sound/pci/fm801.c index bade9b9..f8a662d 100644 --- a/sound/pci/fm801.c +++ b/sound/pci/fm801.c @@ -53,15 +53,15 @@ static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP; /* Enable this card static int tea575x_tuner[SNDRV_CARDS]; static int radio_nr[SNDRV_CARDS] = {[0 ... (SNDRV_CARDS - 1)] = -1};

-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for the FM801 soundcard."); -module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for the FM801 soundcard."); -module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable FM801 soundcard."); -module_param_array(tea575x_tuner, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(tea575x_tuner, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(tea575x_tuner, "TEA575x tuner access method (0 = auto, 1 = SF256-PCS, 2=SF256-PCP, 3=SF64-PCR, 8=disable, +16=tuner-only)."); -module_param_array(radio_nr, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(radio_nr, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(radio_nr, "Radio device numbers");