[PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: Intel: catpt: Carefully use PCI bitwise constants
PM constants for PCI devices are defined with bitwise annotation. When used as is, sparse complains about that:
.../catpt/dsp.c:390:9: warning: restricted pci_power_t degrades to integer .../catpt/dsp.c:414:9: warning: restricted pci_power_t degrades to integer
Force them to be u32 in the driver.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com --- sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c b/sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c index 346bec000306..5454c6d9ab5b 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ int catpt_dsp_power_down(struct catpt_dev *cdev) mask = cdev->spec->d3srampgd_bit | cdev->spec->d3pgd_bit; catpt_updatel_pci(cdev, VDRTCTL0, mask, cdev->spec->d3pgd_bit);
- catpt_updatel_pci(cdev, PMCS, PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK, PCI_D3hot); + catpt_updatel_pci(cdev, PMCS, PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK, (__force u32)PCI_D3hot); /* give hw time to drop off */ udelay(50);
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ int catpt_dsp_power_up(struct catpt_dev *cdev) val = mask & (~CATPT_VDRTCTL2_DTCGE); catpt_updatel_pci(cdev, VDRTCTL2, mask, val);
- catpt_updatel_pci(cdev, PMCS, PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK, PCI_D0); + catpt_updatel_pci(cdev, PMCS, PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK, (__force u32)PCI_D0);
/* SRAM power gating none */ mask = cdev->spec->d3srampgd_bit | cdev->spec->d3pgd_bit;
On 2024-03-07 5:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
PM constants for PCI devices are defined with bitwise annotation. When used as is, sparse complains about that:
.../catpt/dsp.c:390:9: warning: restricted pci_power_t degrades to integer .../catpt/dsp.c:414:9: warning: restricted pci_power_t degrades to integer
Force them to be u32 in the driver.
Thank you for this input, Andy.
Acked-by: Cezary Rojewski cezary.rojewski@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c b/sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c index 346bec000306..5454c6d9ab5b 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ int catpt_dsp_power_down(struct catpt_dev *cdev) mask = cdev->spec->d3srampgd_bit | cdev->spec->d3pgd_bit; catpt_updatel_pci(cdev, VDRTCTL0, mask, cdev->spec->d3pgd_bit);
- catpt_updatel_pci(cdev, PMCS, PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK, PCI_D3hot);
- catpt_updatel_pci(cdev, PMCS, PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK, (__force u32)PCI_D3hot); /* give hw time to drop off */ udelay(50);
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ int catpt_dsp_power_up(struct catpt_dev *cdev) val = mask & (~CATPT_VDRTCTL2_DTCGE); catpt_updatel_pci(cdev, VDRTCTL2, mask, val);
- catpt_updatel_pci(cdev, PMCS, PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK, PCI_D0);
catpt_updatel_pci(cdev, PMCS, PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK, (__force u32)PCI_D0);
/* SRAM power gating none */ mask = cdev->spec->d3srampgd_bit | cdev->spec->d3pgd_bit;
On Thu, 07 Mar 2024 18:37:34 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
PM constants for PCI devices are defined with bitwise annotation. When used as is, sparse complains about that:
.../catpt/dsp.c:390:9: warning: restricted pci_power_t degrades to integer .../catpt/dsp.c:414:9: warning: restricted pci_power_t degrades to integer
Force them to be u32 in the driver.
[...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: Intel: catpt: Carefully use PCI bitwise constants commit: 6c023ad32b192dea51a4f842cc6ecf89bb6238c9
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (3)
-
Andy Shevchenko
-
Cezary Rojewski
-
Mark Brown