I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu chuansheng.liu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Baole Ni baolex.ni@intel.com --- sound/pci/vx222/vx222.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/vx222/vx222.c b/sound/pci/vx222/vx222.c index ecbaf47..3731554 100644 --- a/sound/pci/vx222/vx222.c +++ b/sound/pci/vx222/vx222.c @@ -41,15 +41,15 @@ static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP; /* Enable this card static bool mic[SNDRV_CARDS]; /* microphone */ static int ibl[SNDRV_CARDS]; /* microphone */

-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for Digigram " CARD_NAME " soundcard."); -module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for Digigram " CARD_NAME " soundcard."); -module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable Digigram " CARD_NAME " soundcard."); -module_param_array(mic, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(mic, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(mic, "Enable Microphone."); -module_param_array(ibl, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(ibl, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(ibl, "Capture IBL size.");

/*