[PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Add initialization finishing check in runtime resume
If the initialization is not finished, then filling input data to the FIFO may fail. So it is better to add initialization finishing check in the runtime resume for suspend & resume case.
And consider the case of three instances working in parallel, increase the retry times to 50 for more initialization time.
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@nxp.com --- sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c index aa5edf32d988..bae263b90ac1 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#define IDEAL_RATIO_DECIMAL_DEPTH 26 #define DIVIDER_NUM 64 +#define INIT_TRY_NUM 50
#define pair_err(fmt, ...) \ dev_err(&asrc->pdev->dev, "Pair %c: " fmt, 'A' + index, ##__VA_ARGS__) @@ -579,7 +580,7 @@ static void fsl_asrc_start_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair) { struct fsl_asrc *asrc = pair->asrc; enum asrc_pair_index index = pair->index; - int reg, retry = 10, i; + int reg, retry = INIT_TRY_NUM, i;
/* Enable the current pair */ regmap_update_bits(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCTR, @@ -592,6 +593,10 @@ static void fsl_asrc_start_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair) reg &= ASRCFG_INIRQi_MASK(index); } while (!reg && --retry);
+ /* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */ + if (!retry) + dev_warn(&asrc->pdev->dev, "initialization isn't finished\n"); + /* Make the input fifo to ASRC STALL level */ regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCNCR, ®); for (i = 0; i < pair->channels * 4; i++) @@ -1257,6 +1262,7 @@ static int fsl_asrc_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) { struct fsl_asrc *asrc = dev_get_drvdata(dev); struct fsl_asrc_priv *asrc_priv = asrc->private; + int reg, retry = INIT_TRY_NUM; int i, ret; u32 asrctr;
@@ -1295,6 +1301,17 @@ static int fsl_asrc_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) regmap_update_bits(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCTR, ASRCTR_ASRCEi_ALL_MASK, asrctr);
+ /* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled pairs */ + do { + udelay(5); + regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, ®); + reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7; + } while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7)) && --retry); + + /* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */ + if (!retry) + dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n"); + return 0;
disable_asrck_clk:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 3:47 AM Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@nxp.com wrote:
@@ -1295,6 +1301,17 @@ static int fsl_asrc_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) regmap_update_bits(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCTR, ASRCTR_ASRCEi_ALL_MASK, asrctr);
/* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled pairs */
do {
udelay(5);
regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, ®);
reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7;
} while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7)) && --retry);
/* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
if (!retry)
dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");
Any reason why not just dev_err?
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:15 PM Nicolin Chen nicoleotsuka@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 3:47 AM Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@nxp.com wrote:
@@ -1295,6 +1301,17 @@ static int fsl_asrc_runtime_resume(struct device
*dev)
regmap_update_bits(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCTR, ASRCTR_ASRCEi_ALL_MASK, asrctr);
/* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled pairs */
do {
udelay(5);
regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, ®);
reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7;
} while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7)) &&
--retry);
/* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
if (!retry)
dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");
Any reason why not just dev_err?
Just hesitate to use dev_err. if use dev_err, then should return an error. May one of the pairs is finished, it still can continue.
Best regards Wang Shengjiu
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 6:54 PM Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@gmail.com wrote:
/* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled pairs */
do {
udelay(5);
regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, ®);
reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7;
} while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7)) && --retry);
/* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
if (!retry)
dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");
Any reason why not just dev_err?
Just hesitate to use dev_err. if use dev_err, then should return an error. May one of the pairs is finished, it still can continue.
Makes sense. In that case, why "FIXME" :)
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 5:50 PM Nicolin Chen nicoleotsuka@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 6:54 PM Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@gmail.com wrote:
/* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled pairs
*/
do {
udelay(5);
regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, ®);
reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7;
} while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7))
&& --retry);
/* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
if (!retry)
dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");
Any reason why not just dev_err?
Just hesitate to use dev_err. if use dev_err, then should return an
error.
May one of the pairs is finished, it still can continue.
Makes sense. In that case, why "FIXME" :)
Just want to have a record/note here, need to care about this warning.
Best regards Wang shengjiu
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 3:50 AM Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@gmail.com wrote:
/* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled pairs */
do {
udelay(5);
regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, ®);
reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7;
} while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7)) && --retry);
/* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
if (!retry)
dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");
Any reason why not just dev_err?
Just hesitate to use dev_err. if use dev_err, then should return an error. May one of the pairs is finished, it still can continue.
Makes sense. In that case, why "FIXME" :)
Just want to have a record/note here, need to care about this warning.
"FIXME" feels like something is wrong and literally means that it is waiting for a fix/solution. In your case, it's not waiting for a fix at all, but just an annotation? So, shouldn't it be just "Note:"?
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 7:42 PM Nicolin Chen nicoleotsuka@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 3:50 AM Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@gmail.com wrote:
/* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled
pairs */
do {
udelay(5);
regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, ®);
reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7;
} while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) &
0x7)) && --retry);
/* FIXME: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */
if (!retry)
dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n");
Any reason why not just dev_err?
Just hesitate to use dev_err. if use dev_err, then should return an
error.
May one of the pairs is finished, it still can continue.
Makes sense. In that case, why "FIXME" :)
Just want to have a record/note here, need to care about this warning.
"FIXME" feels like something is wrong and literally means that it is waiting for a fix/solution. In your case, it's not waiting for a fix at all, but just an annotation? So, shouldn't it be just "Note:"?
ok, let me update it.
best regards wang shengjiu
participants (3)
-
Nicolin Chen
-
Shengjiu Wang
-
Shengjiu Wang