[alsa-devel] [PATCHv3 1/2] ALSA: fix emu8000 DRAM sizing for AWE64 Value
Applicable to any kernel since 2013:
The special case added in commit 1338fc97d07a did not handle the possibility that the address space on an AWE64 Value would wrap around at 512 KiB. That is what it does, so the memory is still not detected on those cards.
Fix that with a logic clean-up that eliminates the need for a special case.
Signed-off-by: David Flater dave@flaterco.com --- History: 2015-01-11 v3: In response to feedback from Takashi Iwai, Patch 1: Repeat code to avoid goto middle of loop. Patch 2: Use pr_info not printk. Retested on CT4390 (4 MiB) and CT4380 (512 KiB). 2015-01-09 v2: In response to feedback from Takashi Iwai, 1. Optimize for diff size. 1a. Use goto to avoid indenting and repeating code. 1b. Jettison new debugging printouts. 2. Split printk into second patch. Retested on CT4390 (4 MiB) and CT4380 (512 KiB). 2015-01-08 v1 patch sent to LKML, Alsa Devel and maintainers. Tested on unexpanded CT4390 (4 MiB), CT4520 (512 KiB), and CT4380 (512 KiB).
sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c | 31 +++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c b/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c index 45fcdff..d25e384 100644 --- a/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c +++ b/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c @@ -378,13 +378,12 @@ init_arrays(struct snd_emu8000 *emu) static void size_dram(struct snd_emu8000 *emu) { - int i, size, detected_size; + int i, size;
if (emu->dram_checked) return;
size = 0; - detected_size = 0;
/* write out a magic number */ snd_emu8000_dma_chan(emu, 0, EMU8000_RAM_WRITE); @@ -392,10 +391,19 @@ size_dram(struct snd_emu8000 *emu) EMU8000_SMALW_WRITE(emu, EMU8000_DRAM_OFFSET); EMU8000_SMLD_WRITE(emu, UNIQUE_ID1); snd_emu8000_init_fm(emu); /* This must really be here and not 2 lines back even */ + snd_emu8000_write_wait(emu);
- while (size < EMU8000_MAX_DRAM) { + /* + * Detect first 512 KiB. If a write succeeds at the beginning of a + * 512 KiB page we assume that the whole page is there. + */ + EMU8000_SMALR_WRITE(emu, EMU8000_DRAM_OFFSET); + EMU8000_SMLD_READ(emu); /* discard stale data */ + if (EMU8000_SMLD_READ(emu) != UNIQUE_ID1) + goto skip_detect; /* No RAM */ + snd_emu8000_read_wait(emu);
- size += 512 * 1024; /* increment 512kbytes */ + for (size = 512 * 1024; size < EMU8000_MAX_DRAM; size += 512 * 1024) {
/* Write a unique data on the test address. * if the address is out of range, the data is written on @@ -431,18 +439,9 @@ size_dram(struct snd_emu8000 *emu) snd_emu8000_read_wait(emu);
/* Otherwise, it's valid memory. */ - detected_size = size + 512 * 1024; - } - - /* Distinguish 512 KiB from 0. */ - if (detected_size == 0) { - snd_emu8000_read_wait(emu); - EMU8000_SMALR_WRITE(emu, EMU8000_DRAM_OFFSET); - EMU8000_SMLD_READ(emu); /* discard stale data */ - if (EMU8000_SMLD_READ(emu) == UNIQUE_ID1) - detected_size = 512 * 1024; }
+skip_detect: /* wait until FULL bit in SMAxW register is false */ for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { if ((EMU8000_SMALW_READ(emu) & 0x80000000) == 0) @@ -455,9 +454,9 @@ size_dram(struct snd_emu8000 *emu) snd_emu8000_dma_chan(emu, 1, EMU8000_RAM_CLOSE);
snd_printdd("EMU8000 [0x%lx]: %d Kb on-board memory detected\n", - emu->port1, detected_size/1024); + emu->port1, size/1024);
- emu->mem_size = detected_size; + emu->mem_size = size; emu->dram_checked = 1; }
At Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:08:58 -0500, David Flater wrote:
Applicable to any kernel since 2013:
The special case added in commit 1338fc97d07a did not handle the possibility that the address space on an AWE64 Value would wrap around at 512 KiB. That is what it does, so the memory is still not detected on those cards.
Fix that with a logic clean-up that eliminates the need for a special case.
Signed-off-by: David Flater dave@flaterco.com
I have a different "From" address (vger@flaterco.com) from this sign-off. Which address should I take?
thanks,
Takashi
History: 2015-01-11 v3: In response to feedback from Takashi Iwai, Patch 1: Repeat code to avoid goto middle of loop. Patch 2: Use pr_info not printk. Retested on CT4390 (4 MiB) and CT4380 (512 KiB). 2015-01-09 v2: In response to feedback from Takashi Iwai, 1. Optimize for diff size. 1a. Use goto to avoid indenting and repeating code. 1b. Jettison new debugging printouts. 2. Split printk into second patch. Retested on CT4390 (4 MiB) and CT4380 (512 KiB). 2015-01-08 v1 patch sent to LKML, Alsa Devel and maintainers. Tested on unexpanded CT4390 (4 MiB), CT4520 (512 KiB), and CT4380 (512 KiB).
sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c | 31 +++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c b/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c index 45fcdff..d25e384 100644 --- a/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c +++ b/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c @@ -378,13 +378,12 @@ init_arrays(struct snd_emu8000 *emu) static void size_dram(struct snd_emu8000 *emu) {
- int i, size, detected_size;
int i, size;
if (emu->dram_checked) return;
size = 0;
detected_size = 0;
/* write out a magic number */ snd_emu8000_dma_chan(emu, 0, EMU8000_RAM_WRITE);
@@ -392,10 +391,19 @@ size_dram(struct snd_emu8000 *emu) EMU8000_SMALW_WRITE(emu, EMU8000_DRAM_OFFSET); EMU8000_SMLD_WRITE(emu, UNIQUE_ID1); snd_emu8000_init_fm(emu); /* This must really be here and not 2 lines back even */
- snd_emu8000_write_wait(emu);
- while (size < EMU8000_MAX_DRAM) {
- /*
* Detect first 512 KiB. If a write succeeds at the beginning of a
* 512 KiB page we assume that the whole page is there.
*/
- EMU8000_SMALR_WRITE(emu, EMU8000_DRAM_OFFSET);
- EMU8000_SMLD_READ(emu); /* discard stale data */
- if (EMU8000_SMLD_READ(emu) != UNIQUE_ID1)
goto skip_detect; /* No RAM */
- snd_emu8000_read_wait(emu);
size += 512 * 1024; /* increment 512kbytes */
for (size = 512 * 1024; size < EMU8000_MAX_DRAM; size += 512 * 1024) {
/* Write a unique data on the test address.
- if the address is out of range, the data is written on
@@ -431,18 +439,9 @@ size_dram(struct snd_emu8000 *emu) snd_emu8000_read_wait(emu);
/* Otherwise, it's valid memory. */
detected_size = size + 512 * 1024;
- }
- /* Distinguish 512 KiB from 0. */
- if (detected_size == 0) {
snd_emu8000_read_wait(emu);
EMU8000_SMALR_WRITE(emu, EMU8000_DRAM_OFFSET);
EMU8000_SMLD_READ(emu); /* discard stale data */
if (EMU8000_SMLD_READ(emu) == UNIQUE_ID1)
}detected_size = 512 * 1024;
+skip_detect: /* wait until FULL bit in SMAxW register is false */ for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { if ((EMU8000_SMALW_READ(emu) & 0x80000000) == 0) @@ -455,9 +454,9 @@ size_dram(struct snd_emu8000 *emu) snd_emu8000_dma_chan(emu, 1, EMU8000_RAM_CLOSE);
snd_printdd("EMU8000 [0x%lx]: %d Kb on-board memory detected\n",
emu->port1, detected_size/1024);
emu->port1, size/1024);
- emu->mem_size = detected_size;
- emu->mem_size = size; emu->dram_checked = 1;
}
-- 1.8.4
At Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:09:49 -0500, David Flater wrote:
On 01/12/2015 03:26 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
I have a different "From" address (vger@flaterco.com) from this sign-off. Which address should I take?
You can use dave@ for sign-off purposes.
The author field should be identical with the sign-off while you posted with a different mail address. So, I should correct the from address (vger@) to match with the signed address (dave@), right?
Takashi
On 01/12/2015 08:12 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:09:49 -0500, David Flater wrote:
You can use dave@ for sign-off purposes.
The author field should be identical with the sign-off while you posted with a different mail address. So, I should correct the from address (vger@) to match with the signed address (dave@), right?
Ummm, right. Thanks.
dave@ is my "normal" account. vger@ exists to deal with the special constraints of the LKML. The first patch got attributed to dave@ so I stuck with signing that.
DWF
At Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:21:50 -0500, David Flater wrote:
On 01/12/2015 08:12 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:09:49 -0500, David Flater wrote:
You can use dave@ for sign-off purposes.
The author field should be identical with the sign-off while you posted with a different mail address. So, I should correct the from address (vger@) to match with the signed address (dave@), right?
Ummm, right. Thanks.
dave@ is my "normal" account. vger@ exists to deal with the special constraints of the LKML. The first patch got attributed to dave@ so I stuck with signing that.
OK, applied both patches now. Thanks.
Takashi
participants (2)
-
David Flater
-
Takashi Iwai