[PATCH] ASoC: Variable type completion
'unsigned int' is better than 'unsigned'.
Signed-off-by: Xin Gao gaoxin@cdjrlc.com --- sound/soc/codecs/uda134x.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/uda134x.c b/sound/soc/codecs/uda134x.c index 037833c509f7..607897f1f357 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/uda134x.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/uda134x.c @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int uda134x_soc_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component) struct uda134x_priv *uda134x = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component); struct uda134x_platform_data *pd = uda134x->pd; const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *widgets; - unsigned num_widgets; + unsigned int num_widgets; int ret;
printk(KERN_INFO "UDA134X SoC Audio Codec\n");
On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 23:39:10 +0800, Xin Gao wrote:
'unsigned int' is better than 'unsigned'.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: Variable type completion commit: 1b5efeabf75a74043f1eb509ca3ac183b3ffaf89
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown -
Xin Gao