[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: imx-wm8962: Use a single private structure
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@nxp.com
Commit 8f7206d69ab8c ("ASoC: imx-wm8962: Remove global variables") ended up by assigning the same value for two different structs:
struct imx_priv *priv = snd_soc_card_get_drvdata(card); struct imx_wm8962_data *data = snd_soc_card_get_drvdata(card);
Fix it by consolidating all the private data into a single structure.
Fixes: 8f7206d69ab8c ("ASoC: imx-wm8962: Remove global variables") Reported-by: Leonard Crestez leonard.crestez@nxp.com Suggested-by: Daniel Baluta daniel.baluta@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@nxp.com --- sound/soc/fsl/imx-wm8962.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/imx-wm8962.c b/sound/soc/fsl/imx-wm8962.c index 206b898..29d7e9b 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/imx-wm8962.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/imx-wm8962.c @@ -28,15 +28,12 @@
#define DAI_NAME_SIZE 32
-struct imx_wm8962_data { +struct imx_priv { struct snd_soc_dai_link dai; struct snd_soc_card card; char codec_dai_name[DAI_NAME_SIZE]; char platform_name[DAI_NAME_SIZE]; unsigned int clk_frequency; -}; - -struct imx_priv { struct platform_device *pdev; int sample_rate; snd_pcm_format_t sample_format; @@ -72,7 +69,6 @@ static int imx_wm8962_set_bias_level(struct snd_soc_card *card, struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd; struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai; struct imx_priv *priv = snd_soc_card_get_drvdata(card); - struct imx_wm8962_data *data = snd_soc_card_get_drvdata(card); struct device *dev = &priv->pdev->dev; unsigned int pll_out; int ret; @@ -91,7 +87,7 @@ static int imx_wm8962_set_bias_level(struct snd_soc_card *card, pll_out = priv->sample_rate * 256;
ret = snd_soc_dai_set_pll(codec_dai, WM8962_FLL, - WM8962_FLL_MCLK, data->clk_frequency, + WM8962_FLL_MCLK, priv->clk_frequency, pll_out); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(dev, "failed to start FLL: %d\n", ret); @@ -111,7 +107,7 @@ static int imx_wm8962_set_bias_level(struct snd_soc_card *card, case SND_SOC_BIAS_STANDBY: if (dapm->bias_level == SND_SOC_BIAS_PREPARE) { ret = snd_soc_dai_set_sysclk(codec_dai, - WM8962_SYSCLK_MCLK, data->clk_frequency, + WM8962_SYSCLK_MCLK, priv->clk_frequency, SND_SOC_CLOCK_IN); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(dev, @@ -141,14 +137,13 @@ static int imx_wm8962_late_probe(struct snd_soc_card *card) struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd; struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai; struct imx_priv *priv = snd_soc_card_get_drvdata(card); - struct imx_wm8962_data *data = snd_soc_card_get_drvdata(card); struct device *dev = &priv->pdev->dev; int ret;
rtd = snd_soc_get_pcm_runtime(card, card->dai_link[0].name); codec_dai = rtd->codec_dai; ret = snd_soc_dai_set_sysclk(codec_dai, WM8962_SYSCLK_MCLK, - data->clk_frequency, SND_SOC_CLOCK_IN); + priv->clk_frequency, SND_SOC_CLOCK_IN); if (ret < 0) dev_err(dev, "failed to set sysclk in %s\n", __func__);
@@ -161,7 +156,6 @@ static int imx_wm8962_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct device_node *ssi_np, *codec_np; struct platform_device *ssi_pdev; struct i2c_client *codec_dev; - struct imx_wm8962_data *data; struct imx_priv *priv; struct clk *codec_clk; int int_port, ext_port; @@ -232,12 +226,6 @@ static int imx_wm8962_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto fail; }
- data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!data) { - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto fail; - } - codec_clk = clk_get(&codec_dev->dev, NULL); if (IS_ERR(codec_clk)) { ret = PTR_ERR(codec_clk); @@ -245,39 +233,39 @@ static int imx_wm8962_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto fail; }
- data->clk_frequency = clk_get_rate(codec_clk); + priv->clk_frequency = clk_get_rate(codec_clk); clk_put(codec_clk);
- data->dai.name = "HiFi"; - data->dai.stream_name = "HiFi"; - data->dai.codec_dai_name = "wm8962"; - data->dai.codec_of_node = codec_np; - data->dai.cpu_dai_name = dev_name(&ssi_pdev->dev); - data->dai.platform_of_node = ssi_np; - data->dai.ops = &imx_hifi_ops; - data->dai.dai_fmt = SND_SOC_DAIFMT_I2S | SND_SOC_DAIFMT_NB_NF | + priv->dai.name = "HiFi"; + priv->dai.stream_name = "HiFi"; + priv->dai.codec_dai_name = "wm8962"; + priv->dai.codec_of_node = codec_np; + priv->dai.cpu_dai_name = dev_name(&ssi_pdev->dev); + priv->dai.platform_of_node = ssi_np; + priv->dai.ops = &imx_hifi_ops; + priv->dai.dai_fmt = SND_SOC_DAIFMT_I2S | SND_SOC_DAIFMT_NB_NF | SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBM_CFM;
- data->card.dev = &pdev->dev; - ret = snd_soc_of_parse_card_name(&data->card, "model"); + priv->card.dev = &pdev->dev; + ret = snd_soc_of_parse_card_name(&priv->card, "model"); if (ret) goto fail; - ret = snd_soc_of_parse_audio_routing(&data->card, "audio-routing"); + ret = snd_soc_of_parse_audio_routing(&priv->card, "audio-routing"); if (ret) goto fail; - data->card.num_links = 1; - data->card.owner = THIS_MODULE; - data->card.dai_link = &data->dai; - data->card.dapm_widgets = imx_wm8962_dapm_widgets; - data->card.num_dapm_widgets = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_wm8962_dapm_widgets); + priv->card.num_links = 1; + priv->card.owner = THIS_MODULE; + priv->card.dai_link = &priv->dai; + priv->card.dapm_widgets = imx_wm8962_dapm_widgets; + priv->card.num_dapm_widgets = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_wm8962_dapm_widgets);
- data->card.late_probe = imx_wm8962_late_probe; - data->card.set_bias_level = imx_wm8962_set_bias_level; + priv->card.late_probe = imx_wm8962_late_probe; + priv->card.set_bias_level = imx_wm8962_set_bias_level;
- platform_set_drvdata(pdev, &data->card); - snd_soc_card_set_drvdata(&data->card, data); + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, &priv->card); + snd_soc_card_set_drvdata(&priv->card, priv);
- ret = devm_snd_soc_register_card(&pdev->dev, &data->card); + ret = devm_snd_soc_register_card(&pdev->dev, &priv->card); if (ret) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "snd_soc_register_card failed (%d)\n", ret); goto fail;
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 03:49:57PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@nxp.com
Commit 8f7206d69ab8c ("ASoC: imx-wm8962: Remove global variables") ended up by assigning the same value for two different structs:
struct imx_priv *priv = snd_soc_card_get_drvdata(card); struct imx_wm8962_data *data = snd_soc_card_get_drvdata(card);
Fix it by consolidating all the private data into a single structure.
Instead of having this fix to this driver, I would consider about removing it as I don't see any reason of having it any more since fsl-asoc-card does the same job. Agree?
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Nicolin Chen nicoleotsuka@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of having this fix to this driver, I would consider about removing it as I don't see any reason of having it any more since fsl-asoc-card does the same job. Agree?
Yes, I think we can remove it as it is easier to maintain a single machine driver.
I will send a patch for the removal.
participants (2)
-
Fabio Estevam
-
Nicolin Chen