Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2] sound: usb: mixer: increase control transfer timeout
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Felipe Balbi balbi@ti.com wrote:
100ms might not be enough for slower devices. Increasing timeout to 1000ms doesn't seem like overkill.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi balbi@ti.com
Changes since v1: . Increase all 100ms timeout to 1000ms
sound/usb/mixer.c | 4 ++-- sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c | 10 +++++----- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer.c b/sound/usb/mixer.c index cdd19d7..1c9d443 100644 --- a/sound/usb/mixer.c +++ b/sound/usb/mixer.c @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static int get_ctl_value_v1(struct usb_mixer_elem_info *cval, int request, int v if (snd_usb_ctl_msg(chip->dev, usb_rcvctrlpipe(chip->dev, 0), request, USB_RECIP_INTERFACE | USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_DIR_IN, validx, snd_usb_ctrl_intf(chip) | (cval->id << 8),
- buf, val_len, 100) >= val_len) {
- buf, val_len, 1000) >= val_len) {
*value_ret = convert_signed_value(cval, snd_usb_combine_bytes(buf, val_len)); snd_usb_autosuspend(cval->mixer->chip); return 0; @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ int snd_usb_mixer_set_ctl_value(struct usb_mixer_elem_info *cval, usb_sndctrlpipe(chip->dev, 0), request, USB_RECIP_INTERFACE | USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_DIR_OUT, validx, snd_usb_ctrl_intf(chip) | (cval->id << 8),
- buf, val_len, 100) >= 0) {
- buf, val_len, 1000) >= 0) {
snd_usb_autosuspend(chip); return 0; } diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c b/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c index 3d0f487..7c41399 100644 --- a/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c +++ b/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c @@ -190,18 +190,18 @@ static int snd_audigy2nx_led_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, struct snd_ctl_e err = snd_usb_ctl_msg(mixer->chip->dev, usb_sndctrlpipe(mixer->chip->dev, 0), 0x24, USB_DIR_OUT | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_OTHER,
- !value, 0, NULL, 0, 100);
- !value, 0, NULL, 0, 1000);
/* USB X-Fi S51 Pro */ if (mixer->chip->usb_id == USB_ID(0x041e, 0x30df)) err = snd_usb_ctl_msg(mixer->chip->dev, usb_sndctrlpipe(mixer->chip->dev, 0), 0x24, USB_DIR_OUT | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_OTHER,
- !value, 0, NULL, 0, 100);
- !value, 0, NULL, 0, 1000);
else err = snd_usb_ctl_msg(mixer->chip->dev, usb_sndctrlpipe(mixer->chip->dev, 0), 0x24, USB_DIR_OUT | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_OTHER,
- value, index + 2, NULL, 0, 100);
- value, index + 2, NULL, 0, 1000);
if (err < 0) return err; mixer->audigy2nx_leds[index] = value; @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static void snd_audigy2nx_proc_read(struct snd_info_entry *entry, usb_rcvctrlpipe(mixer->chip->dev, 0), UAC_GET_MEM, USB_DIR_IN | USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE, 0,
- jacks[i].unitid << 8, buf, 3, 100);
- jacks[i].unitid << 8, buf, 3, 1000);
if (err == 3 && (buf[0] == 3 || buf[0] == 6)) snd_iprintf(buffer, "%02x %02x\n", buf[1], buf[2]); else @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static int snd_xonar_u1_switch_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, err = snd_usb_ctl_msg(mixer->chip->dev, usb_sndctrlpipe(mixer->chip->dev, 0), 0x08, USB_DIR_OUT | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_OTHER,
- 50, 0, &new_status, 1, 100);
- 50, 0, &new_status, 1, 1000);
How about also converting to use a local define for timeout value ?
Jassi Brar wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Felipe Balbi balbi@ti.com wrote:
100ms might not be enough for slower devices. Increasing timeout to 1000ms doesn't seem like overkill.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi balbi@ti.com
Changes since v1: . Increase all 100ms timeout to 1000ms
sound/usb/mixer.c | 4 ++-- sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c | 10 +++++----- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
The calls in mixer_quirks.c are device-specific and known to work, so none of them actually require a longer timeout. However, increasing their timeout doesn't hurt either, and ...
buf, val_len, 1000) >= val_len) {
buf, val_len, 1000) >= 0) {
!value, 0, NULL, 0, 1000);
!value, 0, NULL, 0, 1000);
value, index + 2, NULL, 0, 1000);
jacks[i].unitid << 8, buf, 3, 1000);
50, 0, &new_status, 1, 1000);
How about also converting to use a local define for timeout value ?
... now that _all_ calls to snd_usb_ctl_msg use the same timeout value, we could just as well drop this parameter.
Regards, Clemens
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Clemens Ladisch clemens@ladisch.de wrote:
- buf, val_len, 1000) >= val_len) {
- buf, val_len, 1000) >= 0) {
- !value, 0, NULL, 0, 1000);
- !value, 0, NULL, 0, 1000);
- value, index + 2, NULL, 0, 1000);
- jacks[i].unitid << 8, buf, 3, 1000);
- 50, 0, &new_status, 1, 1000);
How about also converting to use a local define for timeout value ?
... now that _all_ calls to snd_usb_ctl_msg use the same timeout value, we could just as well drop this parameter.
Sounds better, esp when we have 9 arguments to snd_usb_ctl_msg!
At Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:52:09 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Clemens Ladisch clemens@ladisch.de wrote:
- buf, val_len, 1000) >= val_len) {
- buf, val_len, 1000) >= 0) {
- !value, 0, NULL, 0, 1000);
- !value, 0, NULL, 0, 1000);
- value, index + 2, NULL, 0, 1000);
- jacks[i].unitid << 8, buf, 3, 1000);
- 50, 0, &new_status, 1, 1000);
How about also converting to use a local define for timeout value ?
... now that _all_ calls to snd_usb_ctl_msg use the same timeout value, we could just as well drop this parameter.
Sounds better, esp when we have 9 arguments to snd_usb_ctl_msg!
Indeed, I'd like to see the reduced arguments, too.
thanks,
Takashi
participants (3)
-
Clemens Ladisch
-
Jassi Brar
-
Takashi Iwai