[alsa-devel] [PATCH V5] ASoC: fsl_esai: Fix missing break in switch statement
case ESAI_HCKT_EXTAL and case ESAI_HCKR_EXTAL should be independent of each other, so replace fall-through with break.
Fixes: 43d24e76b698 ("ASoC: fsl_esai: Add ESAI CPU DAI driver") Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@nxp.com Acked-by: Nicolin Chen nicoleotsuka@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- Changes in v5 - remove new line after Fixes
Changes in v4 - Add acked-by
Changes in v3 - Update subject line and cc stable
Changes in v2 - Fix "Fixes" tag
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c index 3623aa9a6f2e..15202a637197 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int fsl_esai_set_dai_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int clk_id, break; case ESAI_HCKT_EXTAL: ecr |= ESAI_ECR_ETI; - /* fall through */ + break; case ESAI_HCKR_EXTAL: ecr |= ESAI_ECR_ERI; break;
Mark,
I wonder if you are going to take this patch.
Thanks -- Gustavo
On 4/11/19 3:43 AM, S.j. Wang wrote:
case ESAI_HCKT_EXTAL and case ESAI_HCKR_EXTAL should be independent of each other, so replace fall-through with break.
Fixes: 43d24e76b698 ("ASoC: fsl_esai: Add ESAI CPU DAI driver") Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@nxp.com Acked-by: Nicolin Chen nicoleotsuka@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Changes in v5
- remove new line after Fixes
Changes in v4
- Add acked-by
Changes in v3
- Update subject line and cc stable
Changes in v2
- Fix "Fixes" tag
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c index 3623aa9a6f2e..15202a637197 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int fsl_esai_set_dai_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int clk_id, break; case ESAI_HCKT_EXTAL: ecr |= ESAI_ECR_ETI;
/* fall through */
break;
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:59:00PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Mark,
I wonder if you are going to take this patch.
Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled.
participants (3)
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva -
Mark Brown -
S.j. Wang