I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu chuansheng.liu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Baole Ni baolex.ni@intel.com --- sound/pci/trident/trident.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/trident/trident.c b/sound/pci/trident/trident.c index cedf13b..0d56223 100644 --- a/sound/pci/trident/trident.c +++ b/sound/pci/trident/trident.c @@ -51,15 +51,15 @@ static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP; /* Enable this card static int pcm_channels[SNDRV_CARDS] = {[0 ... (SNDRV_CARDS - 1)] = 32}; static int wavetable_size[SNDRV_CARDS] = {[0 ... (SNDRV_CARDS - 1)] = 8192};

-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for Trident 4DWave PCI soundcard."); -module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for Trident 4DWave PCI soundcard."); -module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable Trident 4DWave PCI soundcard."); -module_param_array(pcm_channels, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(pcm_channels, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(pcm_channels, "Number of hardware channels assigned for PCM."); -module_param_array(wavetable_size, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(wavetable_size, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(wavetable_size, "Maximum memory size in kB for wavetable synth.");

static const struct pci_device_id snd_trident_ids[] = {