[PATCH] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5640: Use cfg-lineout:2 in the components string
Use "cfg-lineout:2" in the components string on boards with a lineout instead of "cfg-lineout:1", this better mirrors the speaker part of the components string where we use "cfg-spk:1" for devices with a single speaker and "cfg-spk:2" for stereo speakers.
The lineout is stereo by default, so using ":2" makes more sense, this way we keep ":1" reserved in case we ever encounter a device with a mono lineout.
We can make this change without breaking userspace because no kernel has shipped with "cfg-lineout:1" in the component-string yet; and there also are no userspace bits (UCM profiles) checking for this yet.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com --- sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c index 369642c07a5d..f79234f49c7c 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static int snd_byt_rt5640_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_LINEOUT_AS_HP2) lineout_string = " cfg-hp2:lineout"; else - lineout_string = " cfg-lineout:1"; + lineout_string = " cfg-lineout:2"; }
if (byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_HSMIC2_ON_IN1)
On 8/16/21 6:47 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Use "cfg-lineout:2" in the components string on boards with a lineout instead of "cfg-lineout:1", this better mirrors the speaker part of the components string where we use "cfg-spk:1" for devices with a single speaker and "cfg-spk:2" for stereo speakers.
The lineout is stereo by default, so using ":2" makes more sense, this way we keep ":1" reserved in case we ever encounter a device with a mono lineout.
We can make this change without breaking userspace because no kernel has shipped with "cfg-lineout:1" in the component-string yet; and there also are no userspace bits (UCM profiles) checking for this yet.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com
Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c index 369642c07a5d..f79234f49c7c 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static int snd_byt_rt5640_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_LINEOUT_AS_HP2) lineout_string = " cfg-hp2:lineout"; else
lineout_string = " cfg-lineout:1";
lineout_string = " cfg-lineout:2";}
if (byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_HSMIC2_ON_IN1)
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 13:47:22 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Use "cfg-lineout:2" in the components string on boards with a lineout instead of "cfg-lineout:1", this better mirrors the speaker part of the components string where we use "cfg-spk:1" for devices with a single speaker and "cfg-spk:2" for stereo speakers.
The lineout is stereo by default, so using ":2" makes more sense, this way we keep ":1" reserved in case we ever encounter a device with a mono lineout.
[...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5640: Use cfg-lineout:2 in the components string commit: f8043ef50acaeb396702481bd2701066bac8a2bc
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (3)
-
Hans de Goede -
Mark Brown -
Pierre-Louis Bossart