[alsa-devel] [PATCH] Revert "ASoC: rsnd: make sure it uses lock when it calls rsnd_dai_call"
From: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
This reverts commit 'e9c390df671f ("ASoC: rsnd: make sure it uses lock when it calls rsnd_dai_call)' The additional locks make 1") lock issue when boot 2) lock issue when unbind/rmmod. And there is no problem without these locks. This patch revert it.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert+renesas@glider.be Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com --- sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.c | 27 +++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.c index 99eb109..405cacd 100644 --- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.c +++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.c @@ -731,15 +731,10 @@ static int rsnd_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, { struct snd_soc_dai *dai = rsnd_substream_to_dai(substream); struct rsnd_dai *rdai = rsnd_dai_to_rdai(dai); - struct rsnd_priv *priv = rsnd_dai_to_priv(dai); struct rsnd_dai_stream *io = rsnd_rdai_to_io(rdai, substream); - unsigned long flags; int ret;
- rsnd_lock(priv, flags); ret = rsnd_dai_call(hw_params, io, substream, hw_params); - rsnd_unlock(priv, flags); - if (ret) return ret;
@@ -926,16 +921,14 @@ int rsnd_kctrl_new_e(struct rsnd_mod *mod, static int rsnd_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd) { struct snd_soc_dai *dai = rtd->cpu_dai; - struct rsnd_priv *priv = rsnd_dai_to_priv(dai); struct rsnd_dai *rdai = rsnd_dai_to_rdai(dai); - unsigned long flags; - int ret = 0; + int ret;
- rsnd_lock(priv, flags); - ret |= rsnd_dai_call(pcm_new, &rdai->playback, rtd); - ret |= rsnd_dai_call(pcm_new, &rdai->capture, rtd); - rsnd_unlock(priv, flags); + ret = rsnd_dai_call(pcm_new, &rdai->playback, rtd); + if (ret) + return ret;
+ ret = rsnd_dai_call(pcm_new, &rdai->capture, rtd); if (ret) return ret;
@@ -958,11 +951,8 @@ static const struct snd_soc_component_driver rsnd_soc_component = { static int rsnd_rdai_continuance_probe(struct rsnd_priv *priv, struct rsnd_dai_stream *io) { - unsigned long flags; int ret;
- rsnd_lock(priv, flags); - ret = rsnd_dai_call(probe, io, priv); if (ret == -EAGAIN) { /* @@ -995,7 +985,6 @@ static int rsnd_rdai_continuance_probe(struct rsnd_priv *priv, */ ret = rsnd_dai_call(probe, io, priv); } - rsnd_unlock(priv, flags);
return ret; } @@ -1011,7 +1000,6 @@ static int rsnd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct rsnd_dai *rdai; const struct of_device_id *of_id = of_match_device(rsnd_of_match, dev); const struct rsnd_of_data *of_data; - unsigned long flags; int (*probe_func[])(struct platform_device *pdev, const struct rsnd_of_data *of_data, struct rsnd_priv *priv) = { @@ -1098,12 +1086,10 @@ static int rsnd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) exit_snd_soc: snd_soc_unregister_platform(dev); exit_snd_probe: - rsnd_lock(priv, flags); for_each_rsnd_dai(rdai, priv, i) { rsnd_dai_call(remove, &rdai->playback, priv); rsnd_dai_call(remove, &rdai->capture, priv); } - rsnd_unlock(priv, flags);
return ret; } @@ -1112,7 +1098,6 @@ static int rsnd_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct rsnd_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev); struct rsnd_dai *rdai; - unsigned long flags; void (*remove_func[])(struct platform_device *pdev, struct rsnd_priv *priv) = { rsnd_ssi_remove, @@ -1123,12 +1108,10 @@ static int rsnd_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
- rsnd_lock(priv, flags); for_each_rsnd_dai(rdai, priv, i) { ret |= rsnd_dai_call(remove, &rdai->playback, priv); ret |= rsnd_dai_call(remove, &rdai->capture, priv); } - rsnd_unlock(priv, flags);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(remove_func); i++) remove_func[i](pdev, priv);
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:57:50AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
From: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
This reverts commit 'e9c390df671f ("ASoC: rsnd: make sure it uses lock when it calls rsnd_dai_call)' The additional locks make 1") lock issue when boot 2) lock issue when unbind/rmmod. And there is no problem without these locks. This patch revert it.
Applied, thanks. Please use normal subject lines even for reverts.
participants (2)
-
Kuninori Morimoto
-
Mark Brown