[alsa-devel] [PATCH] The alc268 input_mux should be a selector instead of mixer
Hi,
According to the [0003659], the node 0x23,0x24 is a selector. I checked the alc268 spec on the REALTEK website and it showed that they were selectors indeed. However, current code implement the alc268 input_mux in a mixer way.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Zhe zhe.jiang@intel.com
--- alsa-driver-hg20071219/alsa-kernel/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c 2007-12-18 09:00:08.000000000 +0800 +++ b/alsa-kernel/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c 2007-12-20 10:09:11.000000000 +0800 @@ -9196,19 +9196,13 @@ static struct hda_verb alc268_base_init_ {0x1c, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, AMP_OUT_MUTE}, {0x1d, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, (0x7000 | (0x00 << 8))},
- /* FIXME: use matrix-type input source selection */ - /* Mixer elements: 0x18, 19, 1a, 1c, 14, 15, 0b */ - /* Input mixer1: unmute Mic, F-Mic, Line, CD inputs */ - /* Input mixer2 */ - {0x23, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, (0x7000 | (0x00 << 8))}, - {0x23, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, (0x7000 | (0x01 << 8))}, - {0x23, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, (0x7000 | (0x02 << 8))}, - {0x23, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, (0x7000 | (0x03 << 8))}, - - {0x24, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, (0x7000 | (0x00 << 8))}, - {0x24, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, (0x7000 | (0x01 << 8))}, - {0x24, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, (0x7000 | (0x02 << 8))}, - {0x24, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, (0x7000 | (0x03 << 8))}, + /* Unmute Selector 23h,24h and set the default input to mic-in */ + + {0x23, AC_VERB_SET_CONNECT_SEL, 0x00}, + {0x23, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, AMP_OUT_UNMUTE}, + {0x24, AC_VERB_SET_CONNECT_SEL, 0x00}, + {0x24, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, AMP_OUT_UNMUTE}, + { } };
@@ -9253,29 +9247,14 @@ static int alc268_mux_enum_put(struct sn { struct hda_codec *codec = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); struct alc_spec *spec = codec->spec; - const struct hda_input_mux *imux = spec->input_mux; + unsigned int adc_idx = snd_ctl_get_ioffidx(kcontrol, &ucontrol->id); static hda_nid_t capture_mixers[3] = { 0x23, 0x24 }; hda_nid_t nid = capture_mixers[adc_idx]; - unsigned int *cur_val = &spec->cur_mux[adc_idx]; - unsigned int i, idx;
- idx = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]; - if (idx >= imux->num_items) - idx = imux->num_items - 1; - if (*cur_val == idx) - return 0; - for (i = 0; i < imux->num_items; i++) { - unsigned int v = (i == idx) ? 0 : HDA_AMP_MUTE; - snd_hda_codec_amp_stereo(codec, nid, HDA_INPUT, - imux->items[i].index, - HDA_AMP_MUTE, v); - snd_hda_codec_write_cache(codec, nid, 0, - AC_VERB_SET_CONNECT_SEL, - idx ); - } - *cur_val = idx; - return 1; + return snd_hda_input_mux_put(codec, spec->input_mux, ucontrol, + nid, + &spec->cur_mux[adc_idx]); }
static struct snd_kcontrol_new alc268_capture_alt_mixer[] = {
At Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:38:23 +0800, Jiang zhe wrote:
Hi,
According to the [0003659], the node 0x23,0x24 is a selector. I checked the alc268 spec on the REALTEK website and it showed that they were selectors indeed. However, current code implement the alc268 input_mux in a mixer way.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Zhe zhe.jiang@intel.com
Looks fine. Applied to HG tree now. Thanks!
Takashi
participants (2)
-
Jiang zhe
-
Takashi Iwai