[PATCH 1/2] ASoC: cs42l42: Fix inversion of ADC Notch Switch control
The underlying register field has inverted sense (0 = enabled) so the control definition must be marked as inverted.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald rf@opensource.cirrus.com Fixes: 2c394ca79604 ("ASoC: Add support for CS42L42 codec") --- sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c b/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c index 08ca05bfbeb3..2db87e3a4dc3 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static SOC_ENUM_SINGLE_DECL(cs42l42_wnf05_freq_enum, CS42L42_ADC_WNF_HPF_CTL, static const struct snd_kcontrol_new cs42l42_snd_controls[] = { /* ADC Volume and Filter Controls */ SOC_SINGLE("ADC Notch Switch", CS42L42_ADC_CTL, - CS42L42_ADC_NOTCH_DIS_SHIFT, true, false), + CS42L42_ADC_NOTCH_DIS_SHIFT, true, true), SOC_SINGLE("ADC Weak Force Switch", CS42L42_ADC_CTL, CS42L42_ADC_FORCE_WEAK_VCM_SHIFT, true, false), SOC_SINGLE("ADC Invert Switch", CS42L42_ADC_CTL,
The driver was defining two ALSA controls that both change the same register field for the wind noise filter corner frequency. The filter response has two corners, at different frequencies, and the duplicate controls most likely were an attempt to be able to set the value using either of the frequencies.
However, having two controls changing the same field can be problematic and it is unnecessary. Both frequencies are related to each other so setting one implies exactly what the other would be.
Removing a control affects user-side code, but there is currently no known use of the removed control so it would be best to remove it now before it becomes a problem.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald rf@opensource.cirrus.com Fixes: 2c394ca79604 ("ASoC: Add support for CS42L42 codec") --- sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c | 10 ---------- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c b/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c index 2db87e3a4dc3..a00dc3c65549 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c @@ -425,15 +425,6 @@ static SOC_ENUM_SINGLE_DECL(cs42l42_wnf3_freq_enum, CS42L42_ADC_WNF_HPF_CTL, CS42L42_ADC_WNF_CF_SHIFT, cs42l42_wnf3_freq_text);
-static const char * const cs42l42_wnf05_freq_text[] = { - "280Hz", "315Hz", "350Hz", "385Hz", - "420Hz", "455Hz", "490Hz", "525Hz" -}; - -static SOC_ENUM_SINGLE_DECL(cs42l42_wnf05_freq_enum, CS42L42_ADC_WNF_HPF_CTL, - CS42L42_ADC_WNF_CF_SHIFT, - cs42l42_wnf05_freq_text); - static const struct snd_kcontrol_new cs42l42_snd_controls[] = { /* ADC Volume and Filter Controls */ SOC_SINGLE("ADC Notch Switch", CS42L42_ADC_CTL, @@ -451,7 +442,6 @@ static const struct snd_kcontrol_new cs42l42_snd_controls[] = { CS42L42_ADC_HPF_EN_SHIFT, true, false), SOC_ENUM("HPF Corner Freq", cs42l42_hpf_freq_enum), SOC_ENUM("WNF 3dB Freq", cs42l42_wnf3_freq_enum), - SOC_ENUM("WNF 05dB Freq", cs42l42_wnf05_freq_enum),
/* DAC Volume and Filter Controls */ SOC_SINGLE("DACA Invert Switch", CS42L42_DAC_CTL1,
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:08:33 +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
The underlying register field has inverted sense (0 = enabled) so the control definition must be marked as inverted.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/2] ASoC: cs42l42: Fix inversion of ADC Notch Switch control commit: 30615bd21b4cc3c3bb5ae8bd70e2a915cc5f75c7 [2/2] ASoC: cs42l42: Remove duplicate control for WNF filter frequency commit: 8b353bbeae20e2214c9d9d88bcb2fda4ba145d83
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown -
Richard Fitzgerald