[alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH] ASoC: dapm: add support to pinctrl dapm
From: Srinivas Kandagatla srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Purpose of having pinctrl dapm is to dynamically put the pins in low power state when they are not actively used by the audio and saving power.
Without this each driver has to set the pinctrl states, either during probe or dynamically depending on the callbacks received from ASoC core.
This patch adds a single macro SND_SOC_DAPM_PINCTRL which takes, widget, active and sleep state names, and the dapm would use active and sleep state pinctrl names to put the pins in active and sleep state respectively.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org ---
Hi All,
Purpose of this patch is to discuss the idea of having pinctrl part of dapm.
As an example on Qualcomm SoCs there are multiple I2S Interfaces, each of these interfaces have there own pinctrls setting, It does not make sense for the machine/platform/componet driver to put them in default/active state durning probe/init as it would waste power. If we make these pinctrl part of the dapm sequence, these would only become active when the stream is active which would save power.
This patch adds a single macro SND_SOC_DAPM_PINCTRL which takes, widget, active and sleep state names, and the dapm would use active and sleep state pinctrl names to put the pins in active and sleep state respectively.
Thanks, Srini
include/sound/soc-dapm.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/sound/soc-dapm.h b/include/sound/soc-dapm.h index 344b96c206a3..a6ce2de4e20a 100644 --- a/include/sound/soc-dapm.h +++ b/include/sound/soc-dapm.h @@ -269,6 +269,13 @@ struct device; .reg = SND_SOC_NOPM, .shift = wdelay, .event = dapm_regulator_event, \ .event_flags = SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU | SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMD, \ .on_val = wflags} +#define SND_SOC_DAPM_PINCTRL(wname, active, sleep) \ +{ .id = snd_soc_dapm_pinctrl, .name = wname, \ + .priv = (&(struct snd_soc_dapm_pinctrl_priv) \ + { .active_state = active, .sleep_state = sleep,}), \ + .reg = SND_SOC_NOPM, .event = dapm_pinctrl_event, \ + .event_flags = SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU | SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMD } +
/* dapm kcontrol types */ @@ -374,6 +381,8 @@ int dapm_regulator_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w, struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, int event); int dapm_clock_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w, struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, int event); +int dapm_pinctrl_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w, + struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, int event);
/* dapm controls */ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, @@ -500,6 +509,7 @@ enum snd_soc_dapm_type { snd_soc_dapm_pre, /* machine specific pre widget - exec first */ snd_soc_dapm_post, /* machine specific post widget - exec last */ snd_soc_dapm_supply, /* power/clock supply */ + snd_soc_dapm_pinctrl, /* pinctrl */ snd_soc_dapm_regulator_supply, /* external regulator */ snd_soc_dapm_clock_supply, /* external clock */ snd_soc_dapm_aif_in, /* audio interface input */ @@ -581,6 +591,7 @@ struct snd_soc_dapm_widget {
void *priv; /* widget specific data */ struct regulator *regulator; /* attached regulator */ + struct pinctrl *pinctrl; /* attached pinctrl */ const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params; /* params for dai links */ unsigned int num_params; /* number of params for dai links */ unsigned int params_select; /* currently selected param for dai link */ @@ -683,6 +694,11 @@ struct snd_soc_dapm_stats { int neighbour_checks; };
+struct snd_soc_dapm_pinctrl_priv { + const char *active_state; + const char *sleep_state; +}; + /** * snd_soc_dapm_init_bias_level() - Initialize DAPM bias level * @dapm: The DAPM context to initialize diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c index 40085a4c8f92..babff1cd2849 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ #include <linux/debugfs.h> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> #include <linux/clk.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <sound/core.h> @@ -72,6 +73,7 @@ snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm, static int dapm_up_seq[] = { [snd_soc_dapm_pre] = 0, [snd_soc_dapm_regulator_supply] = 1, + [snd_soc_dapm_pinctrl] = 1, [snd_soc_dapm_clock_supply] = 1, [snd_soc_dapm_supply] = 2, [snd_soc_dapm_micbias] = 3, @@ -119,6 +121,7 @@ static int dapm_down_seq[] = { [snd_soc_dapm_dai_link] = 11, [snd_soc_dapm_supply] = 12, [snd_soc_dapm_clock_supply] = 13, + [snd_soc_dapm_pinctrl] = 13, [snd_soc_dapm_regulator_supply] = 13, [snd_soc_dapm_post] = 14, }; @@ -1287,6 +1290,33 @@ int dapm_regulator_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dapm_regulator_event);
+/* + * Handler for pinctrl widget. + */ +int dapm_pinctrl_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w, + struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, int event) +{ + struct snd_soc_dapm_pinctrl_priv *priv = w->priv; + struct pinctrl *p = w->pinctrl; + struct pinctrl_state *s; + + if (!p || !priv) + return -EIO; + + soc_dapm_async_complete(w->dapm); + + if (SND_SOC_DAPM_EVENT_ON(event)) + s = pinctrl_lookup_state(p, priv->active_state); + else + s = pinctrl_lookup_state(p, priv->sleep_state); + + if (IS_ERR(s)) + return PTR_ERR(s); + + return pinctrl_select_state(p, s); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dapm_pinctrl_event); + /* * Handler for clock supply widget. */ @@ -1900,6 +1930,7 @@ static int dapm_power_widgets(struct snd_soc_card *card, int event) break; case snd_soc_dapm_supply: case snd_soc_dapm_regulator_supply: + case snd_soc_dapm_pinctrl: case snd_soc_dapm_clock_supply: case snd_soc_dapm_micbias: if (d->target_bias_level < SND_SOC_BIAS_STANDBY) @@ -2313,6 +2344,7 @@ static ssize_t dapm_widget_show_component(struct snd_soc_component *cmpnt, case snd_soc_dapm_mixer_named_ctl: case snd_soc_dapm_supply: case snd_soc_dapm_regulator_supply: + case snd_soc_dapm_pinctrl: case snd_soc_dapm_clock_supply: if (w->name) count += sprintf(buf + count, "%s: %s\n", @@ -3462,6 +3494,17 @@ snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm, w->name, ret); } break; + case snd_soc_dapm_pinctrl: + w->pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get(dapm->dev); + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(w->pinctrl)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(w->pinctrl); + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) + return ERR_PTR(ret); + dev_err(dapm->dev, "ASoC: Failed to request %s: %d\n", + w->name, ret); + return NULL; + } + break; case snd_soc_dapm_clock_supply: #ifdef CONFIG_CLKDEV_LOOKUP w->clk = devm_clk_get(dapm->dev, w->name); @@ -3541,6 +3584,7 @@ snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm, break; case snd_soc_dapm_supply: case snd_soc_dapm_regulator_supply: + case snd_soc_dapm_pinctrl: case snd_soc_dapm_clock_supply: case snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol: w->is_supply = 1;
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:32:13PM +0000, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org wrote:
+int dapm_pinctrl_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, int event)
+{
- struct snd_soc_dapm_pinctrl_priv *priv = w->priv;
- struct pinctrl *p = w->pinctrl;
- struct pinctrl_state *s;
- if (!p || !priv)
return -EIO;
- soc_dapm_async_complete(w->dapm);
This doesn't look right - we're trying to synchronize with the DAPM async queue from something that should be run inside that very queue. What is this supposed to be doing?
Thanks for the review,
On 05/03/18 15:52, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:32:13PM +0000, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org wrote:
+int dapm_pinctrl_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, int event)
+{
- struct snd_soc_dapm_pinctrl_priv *priv = w->priv;
- struct pinctrl *p = w->pinctrl;
- struct pinctrl_state *s;
- if (!p || !priv)
return -EIO;
- soc_dapm_async_complete(w->dapm);
This doesn't look right - we're trying to synchronize with the DAPM async queue from something that should be run inside that very queue. What is this supposed to be doing?
I thought this is supposed to ensure that any pending asynchronous I/O is completed before touching pinctrl framework.
TBH, I have done this inline with regulators/clk dapm events.
--srini
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 08:35:48PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
On 05/03/18 15:52, Mark Brown wrote:
This doesn't look right - we're trying to synchronize with the DAPM async queue from something that should be run inside that very queue. What is this supposed to be doing?
I thought this is supposed to ensure that any pending asynchronous I/O is completed before touching pinctrl framework.
No, it completes all the pending DAPM operations. async I/O is part of that but it's not the only thing.
On 07/03/18 15:13, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 08:35:48PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
On 05/03/18 15:52, Mark Brown wrote:
This doesn't look right - we're trying to synchronize with the DAPM async queue from something that should be run inside that very queue. What is this supposed to be doing?
I thought this is supposed to ensure that any pending asynchronous I/O is completed before touching pinctrl framework.
No, it completes all the pending DAPM operations. async I/O is part of that but it's not the only thing.
Thanks for explaining, I will remove the synchronizing part and send a next version,
thanks, srini
participants (3)
-
Mark Brown
-
Srinivas Kandagatla
-
srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org