[PATCH] ASoC: amd: acp6x-pdm-dma: Constify static snd_soc_dai_ops
The only usage of acp6x_pdm_dai_ops is to assign its address to the ops field in the snd_soc_dai_driver struct, which is a pointer to const snd_soc_dai_ops. Make it const to allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.
Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com --- sound/soc/amd/yc/acp6x-pdm-dma.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/yc/acp6x-pdm-dma.c b/sound/soc/amd/yc/acp6x-pdm-dma.c index e604f4ea524f..7e66393e4153 100644 --- a/sound/soc/amd/yc/acp6x-pdm-dma.c +++ b/sound/soc/amd/yc/acp6x-pdm-dma.c @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int acp6x_pdm_dai_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, return ret; }
-static struct snd_soc_dai_ops acp6x_pdm_dai_ops = { +static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops acp6x_pdm_dai_ops = { .trigger = acp6x_pdm_dai_trigger, };
On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 12:08:48 +0100, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
The only usage of acp6x_pdm_dai_ops is to assign its address to the ops field in the snd_soc_dai_driver struct, which is a pointer to const snd_soc_dai_ops. Make it const to allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: amd: acp6x-pdm-dma: Constify static snd_soc_dai_ops commit: 7bef00106bc68beddcddcd06e3b02dde5525face
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown -
Rikard Falkeborn