[PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: No need to unbind routes within a pipeline
From: Ranjani Sridharan ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com
The FW currently ignores unbinding routes if the source and sink widgets belong to the same pipeline. So no need to send the IPC at all in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Bard Liao yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Rander Wang rander.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com --- sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c b/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c index 59f4d42f9011..89f2dc4f564d 100644 --- a/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c +++ b/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c @@ -1744,12 +1744,19 @@ static int sof_ipc4_route_free(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, struct snd_sof_route *s struct sof_ipc4_fw_module *sink_fw_module = sink_widget->module_info; struct sof_ipc4_msg msg = {{ 0 }}; u32 header, extension; - int ret; + int ret = 0;
dev_dbg(sdev->dev, "unbind modules %s:%d -> %s:%d\n", src_widget->widget->name, sroute->src_queue_id, sink_widget->widget->name, sroute->dst_queue_id);
+ /* + * routes belonging to the same pipeline will be disconnected by the FW when the pipeline + * is freed. So avoid sending this IPC which will be ignored by the FW anyway. + */ + if (src_widget->pipe_widget == sink_widget->pipe_widget) + goto out; + header = src_fw_module->man4_module_entry.id; header |= SOF_IPC4_MOD_INSTANCE(src_widget->instance_id); header |= SOF_IPC4_MSG_TYPE_SET(SOF_IPC4_MOD_UNBIND); @@ -1768,7 +1775,7 @@ static int sof_ipc4_route_free(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, struct snd_sof_route *s if (ret < 0) dev_err(sdev->dev, "failed to unbind modules %s -> %s\n", src_widget->widget->name, sink_widget->widget->name); - +out: sof_ipc4_put_queue_id(sink_widget, sroute->dst_queue_id, SOF_PIN_TYPE_SINK); sof_ipc4_put_queue_id(src_widget, sroute->src_queue_id, SOF_PIN_TYPE_SOURCE);
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:16:15 +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
The FW currently ignores unbinding routes if the source and sink widgets belong to the same pipeline. So no need to send the IPC at all in the first place.
Applied to
broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: No need to unbind routes within a pipeline commit: 9a62d87acee94919af1fe92f2412fff83dcbcda0
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown
-
Peter Ujfalusi