Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: adau1373: adau1373_hw_params: Silence overflow warning
On 03/11/2013 04:37 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
On 03/11/2013 04:01 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 03/10/2013 06:34 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_SOURCE is defined as BIT(5) which uses UL constants. On amd64 the result of the ones complement operator is then truncated to unsigned int according to the prototype of snd_soc_update_bits(). I think gcc is correctly warning that the upper 32 bits are lost.
sound/soc/codecs/adau1373.c: In function 'adau1373_hw_params': sound/soc/codecs/adau1373.c:940:3: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]
gcc version 4.6.3
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen lars@metafoo.de Cc: Liam Girdwood lgirdwood@gmail.com Cc: Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Cc: Jaroslav Kysela perex@perex.cz Cc: Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de Cc: device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com
sound/soc/codecs/adau1373.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/adau1373.c b/sound/soc/codecs/adau1373.c index 068b3ae..56ed788 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/adau1373.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/adau1373.c @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ struct adau1373 { #define ADAU1373_DAI_FORMAT_I2S 0x2 #define ADAU1373_DAI_FORMAT_DSP 0x3
-#define ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_SOURCE BIT(5) +#define ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_SOURCE (unsigned int)BIT(5)
Hm, that's a bit ugly. How about the following instead:
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/adau1373.c b/sound/soc/codecs/adau1373.c index 068b3ae..1aa10dd 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/adau1373.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/adau1373.c @@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ struct adau1373 { #define ADAU1373_DAI_FORMAT_DSP 0x3
#define ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_SOURCE BIT(5) +#define ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_SR_MASK (0x07 << 2) +#define ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_BCLK_MASK 0x03 #define ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_32 0x03 #define ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_64 0x02 #define ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_128 0x01 @@ -937,7 +939,8 @@ static int adau1373_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, adau1373_dai->enable_src = (div != 0);
snd_soc_update_bits(codec, ADAU1373_BCLKDIV(dai->id),
~ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_SOURCE, (div << 2) | ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_64);
ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_SR_MASK | ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_BCLK_MASK,
(div << 2) | ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_64);
switch (params_format(params)) { case SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S16_LE:
That seems way more complicated then need be. It also uses 2 bits in the mask whereas the original code only used 1, e.g., bit 5. Is that correct ?
The BCLKDIV has three fields. The bitclock divider (bit 0-1), the samplerate (bit 2-4) and the source select (bit 5). Here we want to update the bitclock divider field and the samplerate field. When I wrote the code I was lazy and used ~ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_SOURCE as the mask, which for this register is functional equivalent to ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_SR_MASK | ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_BCLK_MASK.
How about just open coding the macro thusly:
#define ADAU1373_BCLKDIV_SOURCE (1<<5) /*BIT(5)*/
But now there is a inconsistency where we sometimes use (1<<x) and sometimes BIT(x). I prefer my solution.
- Lars
participants (1)
-
Lars-Peter Clausen