[PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Update slots number according to bclk_ratio
The bclk_ratio is set by .set_bclk_ratio API. bclk_ratio = slots * slot_width So if slots is not set by .set_tdm_slot, then it can be calculated by bclk_ratio.
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@nxp.com --- sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c index 7523bb944b21..acf76ea21138 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c @@ -535,12 +535,14 @@ static int fsl_sai_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, u32 pins, bclk; int ret, i;
- if (sai->slots) - slots = sai->slots; - if (sai->slot_width) slot_width = sai->slot_width;
+ if (sai->slots) + slots = sai->slots; + else if (sai->bclk_ratio) + slots = sai->bclk_ratio / slot_width; + pins = DIV_ROUND_UP(channels, slots);
/*
On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 14:45:26 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
The bclk_ratio is set by .set_bclk_ratio API. bclk_ratio = slots * slot_width So if slots is not set by .set_tdm_slot, then it can be calculated by bclk_ratio.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: fsl_sai: Update slots number according to bclk_ratio commit: 837b40293de66a5b96f883f540512ec5c3867610
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown -
Shengjiu Wang