[PATCH] ASoC: Intel: catpt: Drop redundant enum constant
CATPT_SSP_IFACE_LAST is being used only to calculate CATPT_SSP_COUNT. Make CATPT_SSP_COUNT part of the enum directly and remove the redundant constant.
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski cezary.rojewski@intel.com --- sound/soc/intel/catpt/messages.h | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/catpt/messages.h b/sound/soc/intel/catpt/messages.h index 978a20b3f471..c17e948d9f52 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/catpt/messages.h +++ b/sound/soc/intel/catpt/messages.h @@ -219,11 +219,9 @@ int catpt_ipc_free_stream(struct catpt_dev *cdev, u8 stream_hw_id); enum catpt_ssp_iface { CATPT_SSP_IFACE_0 = 0, CATPT_SSP_IFACE_1 = 1, - CATPT_SSP_IFACE_LAST = CATPT_SSP_IFACE_1, + CATPT_SSP_COUNT, };
-#define CATPT_SSP_COUNT (CATPT_SSP_IFACE_LAST + 1) - enum catpt_mclk_frequency { CATPT_MCLK_OFF = 0, CATPT_MCLK_FREQ_6_MHZ = 1,
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 16:16:47 +0200, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
CATPT_SSP_IFACE_LAST is being used only to calculate CATPT_SSP_COUNT. Make CATPT_SSP_COUNT part of the enum directly and remove the redundant constant.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: Intel: catpt: Drop redundant enum constant commit: b695f5c0a86ea685500a72b6a9959da041f26da6
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Cezary Rojewski -
Mark Brown