[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: adav80x: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056531 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com --- sound/soc/codecs/adav80x.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/adav80x.c b/sound/soc/codecs/adav80x.c index db21ecb..8b9ca7e 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/adav80x.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/adav80x.c @@ -648,6 +648,7 @@ static int adav80x_set_pll(struct snd_soc_component *component, int pll_id, pll_ctrl1 |= ADAV80X_PLL_CTRL1_PLLDIV; break; } + /* fall through */ default: return -EINVAL; }
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 02:19:33PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
@@ -648,6 +648,7 @@ static int adav80x_set_pll(struct snd_soc_component *component, int pll_id, pll_ctrl1 |= ADAV80X_PLL_CTRL1_PLLDIV; break; }
/* fall through */
Are you *positive* this is a deliberate fall through?
On 08/09/2018 11:30 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 02:19:33PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
@@ -648,6 +648,7 @@ static int adav80x_set_pll(struct snd_soc_component *component, int pll_id, pll_ctrl1 |= ADAV80X_PLL_CTRL1_PLLDIV; break; }
/* fall through */Are you *positive* this is a deliberate fall through?
It is. But it might make sense to re-order the code to look like
case 54000000: if (source != ADAV80X_PLL_SRC_XIN) return -EINVAL;
pll_ctrl1 |= ADAV80X_PLL_CTRL1_PLLDIV; break;
It is just as many lines added when adding the /* fall through */, but it makes it more obvious what is going on.
Either way:
Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen lars@metafoo.de
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 01:23:58PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 08/09/2018 11:30 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
It is. But it might make sense to re-order the code to look like
case 54000000: if (source != ADAV80X_PLL_SRC_XIN) return -EINVAL; pll_ctrl1 |= ADAV80X_PLL_CTRL1_PLLDIV; break;
It is just as many lines added when adding the /* fall through */, but it makes it more obvious what is going on.
Yes, it's much more obvious.
The patch
ASoC: adav80x: mark expected switch fall-through
has been applied to the asoc tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
From f2cf0ef7c0ce141bb38f315c34c56e6ef5667a27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" gustavo@embeddedor.com Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 14:19:33 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: adav80x: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056531 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen lars@metafoo.de Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org --- sound/soc/codecs/adav80x.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/adav80x.c b/sound/soc/codecs/adav80x.c index db21ecbe0762..8b9ca7e7a682 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/adav80x.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/adav80x.c @@ -648,6 +648,7 @@ static int adav80x_set_pll(struct snd_soc_component *component, int pll_id, pll_ctrl1 |= ADAV80X_PLL_CTRL1_PLLDIV; break; } + /* fall through */ default: return -EINVAL; }
participants (3)
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva -
Lars-Peter Clausen -
Mark Brown