[PATCH] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5640: Add quirk for MPMAN Converter9 2-in-1
The MPMAN Converter9 2-in-1 almost fully works with out default settings. The only problem is that it has only 1 speaker so any sounds only playing on the right channel get lost.
Add a quirk for this model using the default settings + MONO_SPEAKER.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com --- sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c index 479992f4e97a..fc202747ba83 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c @@ -591,6 +591,16 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id byt_rt5640_quirk_table[] = { BYT_RT5640_SSP0_AIF1 | BYT_RT5640_MCLK_EN), }, + { /* MPMAN Converter 9, similar hw as the I.T.Works TW891 2-in-1 */ + .matches = { + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "MPMAN"), + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Converter9"), + }, + .driver_data = (void *)(BYTCR_INPUT_DEFAULTS | + BYT_RT5640_MONO_SPEAKER | + BYT_RT5640_SSP0_AIF1 | + BYT_RT5640_MCLK_EN), + }, { /* MPMAN MPWIN895CL */ .matches = {
On 9/1/20 3:06 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
The MPMAN Converter9 2-in-1 almost fully works with out default settings. The only problem is that it has only 1 speaker so any sounds only playing on the right channel get lost.
Add a quirk for this model using the default settings + MONO_SPEAKER.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com
Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Thanks Hans!
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 10:06:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
The MPMAN Converter9 2-in-1 almost fully works with out default settings. The only problem is that it has only 1 speaker so any sounds only playing on the right channel get lost.
Add a quirk for this model using the default settings + MONO_SPEAKER.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5640: Add quirk for MPMAN Converter9 2-in-1 commit: 6a0137101f47301fff2da6ba4b9048383d569909
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (3)
-
Hans de Goede -
Mark Brown -
Pierre-Louis Bossart