At Tue, 6 Jan 2015 13:40:14 -0800, Aaron Plattner wrote:

Vendor ID 0x10de0072 is used by a yet-to-be-named GPU chip.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Plattner aplattner@nvidia.com

Do you think it would make sense to add some kind of wildcard match for 0x10de* -> patch_nvhdmi?

Looking at the situation until now, I guess this would be OK. Feel free to send an additional patch to do that.

In anyway, applied this patch now.

thanks,

Takashi

sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c b/sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c index 5f13d2d18079..b422e406a9cb 100644 --- a/sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c +++ b/sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c @@ -3353,6 +3353,7 @@ static const struct hda_codec_preset snd_hda_preset_hdmi[] = { { .id = 0x10de0067, .name = "MCP67 HDMI", .patch = patch_nvhdmi_2ch }, { .id = 0x10de0070, .name = "GPU 70 HDMI/DP", .patch = patch_nvhdmi }, { .id = 0x10de0071, .name = "GPU 71 HDMI/DP", .patch = patch_nvhdmi }, +{ .id = 0x10de0072, .name = "GPU 72 HDMI/DP", .patch = patch_nvhdmi }, { .id = 0x10de8001, .name = "MCP73 HDMI", .patch = patch_nvhdmi_2ch }, { .id = 0x11069f80, .name = "VX900 HDMI/DP", .patch = patch_via_hdmi }, { .id = 0x11069f81, .name = "VX900 HDMI/DP", .patch = patch_via_hdmi }, @@ -3413,6 +3414,7 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("snd-hda-codec-id:10de0060"); MODULE_ALIAS("snd-hda-codec-id:10de0067"); MODULE_ALIAS("snd-hda-codec-id:10de0070"); MODULE_ALIAS("snd-hda-codec-id:10de0071"); +MODULE_ALIAS("snd-hda-codec-id:10de0072"); MODULE_ALIAS("snd-hda-codec-id:10de8001"); MODULE_ALIAS("snd-hda-codec-id:11069f80"); MODULE_ALIAS("snd-hda-codec-id:11069f81"); -- 2.2.1