On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 12:10:52PM -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
If kernel solution is preferable are you going to accept Dylan's solution then? Or you think it should be implemented other way?
To repeat my original review comment:
| The usual thing to do with these is just to halve the resolution of the | control by ignoring the low bit so that you get exact values, though for | this device that does result in a relatively large step (step sizes like | 0.125dB are more common). I dunno, doesn't make much difference either | way from my point of view.
Sorry, My fault here. I forgot to send a v2 after I got back from ELCE. I'll try to dig up the machine I have that change on and get it sent out later in the week.