Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: i2s-tdm: Fix rockchip, i2s-[rt]x-route

On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:49:42 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

make dt_binding_check:

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml: properties:rockchip,i2s-rx-route: {'required': ['maxItems']} is not allowed for {'$ref': '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array', 'description': 'Defines the mapping of I2S RX sdis to I2S data bus lines. By default, they are mapped one-to-one. rockchip,i2s-rx-route = <3> would mean sdi3 is receiving from data0.', 'maxItems': 4, 'items': [{'enum': [0, 1, 2, 3]}]}
   hint: "maxItems" is not needed with an "items" list
   from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/items.yaml#
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml: properties:rockchip,i2s-tx-route: {'required': ['maxItems']} is not allowed for {'$ref': '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array', 'description': 'Defines the mapping of I2S TX sdos to I2S data bus lines. By default, they are mapped one-to-one. rockchip,i2s-tx-route = <3> would mean sdo3 is sending to data0.', 'maxItems': 4, 'items': [{'enum': [0, 1, 2, 3]}]}
   hint: "maxItems" is not needed with an "items" list
   from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/items.yaml#

[...]

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: i2s-tdm: Fix rockchip,i2s-[rt]x-route commit: 51a67d6e28c6e1f10c8ef95b4f5fbf204ebbeb24

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.

Thanks, Mark