On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Monday, January 8, 2018 2:09:20 PM CET Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Sat, 2018-01-06 at 00:27 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote:
Sometimes the user wants to have device name of the match rather than just checking if device present or not. To make life easier for such users introduce acpi_dev_get_first_match_name() helper based on code for acpi_dev_present().
For example, GPIO driver for Intel Merrifield needs to know the device name of pin control to be able to apply GPIO mapping table to the proper device.
To be more consistent with the purpose rename
struct acpi_dev_present_info -> struct acpi_dev_match_info acpi_dev_present_cb() -> acpi_dev_match_cb()
in the utils.c file.
Tested-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.co m> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
OK, so which way do you want this to go in?
If you have no objections, patch 1 may go straight forward to linux-pm tree as far as you are okay with the contents.
I dunno, if Mika's ACK is enough to you to get the second one (patch 2) together, otherwise Linus' ACK would be needed or leave it for next cycle.
According to what Mark and Pierre told previously I guess we just postpone patch 3 for next cycle.
OK
Linus, can you please have a look at the [2/3] from this lot and let me know whether or not I can take it?
OK looking...
Yours, Linus Walleij