On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Grant Likely grant.likely@secretlab.ca wrote:
The sound0 node needs a compatible value,
I knew I was forgetting something
the sound-device node should probably have one too.
The aliases, cpus, and memory node don't have a compatible property, and I was modeling the design after the aliases node.
The sound0 node should have something board specific like "fsl,mpc8610hpcd-sound" to make it clear that the binding really only applies to this particular board. It would also be a good idea to prefix all of the property names with 'fsl,' to avoid conflicting with any future common bindings or conventions. Other boards can use the same binding, but they would get a different compatible value (the driver could bind on both).
The aliases node doesn't have an fsl, prefix. I understand the need for the prefix, but I wonder why we don't do that for the aliases node.
I'm not a huge fan of the name "sound-devices" for the parent node. There are other sorts of things that we need 'virtual' device nodes to describe. It would be nice to have a single place for collecting nodes for stuff like this. Perhaps this:
system { compatible = "system-devices"; sound0 { compatible = "fsl,mpc8610hpcd-sound"; fsl,ssi = &ssi0; fsl,playback-dma = &dma00; fsl,capture-dma = &dma01; fsl,codec = &cs4270; }; };
I like that.