The patch
ASoC: fsl_spdif: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit
has been applied to the asoc tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
From b999a7a9e72bd2d37b5d03772cedfc4dd45875bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" gustavo@embeddedor.com Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 09:18:33 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit
Add suffix ULL to constant 64 in order to give the compiler complete information about the proper arithmetic to use.
Notice that such constant is used in a context that expects an expression of type u64 (64 bits, unsigned) and the following expression is currently being evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic:
rate[index] * txclk_df * 64
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1222129 ("Unintentional integer overflow") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com Acked-by: Nicolin Chen nicoleotsuka@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org --- sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c index 9b59d87b61bf..740b90df44bb 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ static u32 fsl_spdif_txclk_caldiv(struct fsl_spdif_priv *spdif_priv,
for (sysclk_df = sysclk_dfmin; sysclk_df <= sysclk_dfmax; sysclk_df++) { for (txclk_df = 1; txclk_df <= 128; txclk_df++) { - rate_ideal = rate[index] * txclk_df * 64; + rate_ideal = rate[index] * txclk_df * 64ULL; if (round) rate_actual = clk_round_rate(clk, rate_ideal); else