On 19. 8. 2022, at 15:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org wrote:
On 19/08/2022 15:58, Martin Povišer wrote:
On 19. 8. 2022, at 14:54, Martin Povišer povik+lin@cutebit.org wrote:
+properties:
- compatible:
- items:
- enum:- apple,t8103-mca- apple,t6000-mcaSince it was brought up last time but I didn’t respond: the nonalphabetical order is as the chips were introduced (and matches other schemas).
Sure, just keep that order for future compatibles as well - so always put them according to verifiable time of market introduction...
This is very poor reason, instead of alphabetical order. Even worse reason is repeating wrong pattern just because someone else did it.
Best regards, Krzysztof
I don’t see it nearly as clear-cut. Adding to the end seems pretty foolproof too, but OK, next submission will have it alphabet. ordered.
Best, Martin