5 Aug
2011
5 Aug
'11
11:30 a.m.
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:00:52PM +0800, Scott Jiang wrote:
Why are you replying off-list? You should implement 16x8 SPI reads in the core stuff I'd expect, then disable cache for the CODEC.
Sorry, I just forgot to CC. I wonder if rbtree compress type can support this kind of sparse register?
Yes, rbtree works fine with this. You'd still take a hit on the size of your register defaults though.
And should the patch aginst 3.0 or 3.2?
3.0 can't be patched, though you could try submitting a patch to the stable guys. Probably best to start off with 3.1 and see where we go from there.