6 Mar
2015
6 Mar
'15
5:47 p.m.
At Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:41:42 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com
We can simplify the code by returning patch_build_controls() directly.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com
Thanks, applied.
Takashi
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c b/sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c index eca2210..f4234ed 100644 --- a/sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c +++ b/sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c @@ -3360,14 +3360,8 @@ AC97_SINGLE("DC Offset removal", 0x5a, 10, 1, 0),
static int patch_vt1613_specific(struct snd_ac97 *ac97) {
- int err;
- err = patch_build_controls(ac97, &snd_ac97_controls_vt1613[0],
ARRAY_SIZE(snd_ac97_controls_vt1613));
- if (err)
return err;
- return 0;
- return patch_build_controls(ac97, &snd_ac97_controls_vt1613[0],
ARRAY_SIZE(snd_ac97_controls_vt1613));
};
static const struct snd_ac97_build_ops patch_vt1613_ops = {
1.9.1