6 Nov
2019
6 Nov
'19
3:45 a.m.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:40 PM Kuninori Morimoto < kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> wrote:
Hi Ranjani
Thank you for your review
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired
function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired,
etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult
to
debug. snd_soc_bind_card() is calling snd_soc_dapm_init() for both card and component. Let's call paired snd_soc_dapm_shutdown() at paired soc_cleanup_card_resources(). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> ---
(snip)
You removed snd_soc_bind_card in one of the patches but then leaving
snd_soc_unbind_card() will be unbalanced isnt it?
Why not just have instantiate_card() and cleanup_card_resources()?
Do you mean [7/9] patch ? It merges snd_soc_instantiate_card() and snd_soc_bind_card(). Thus, snd_soc_bind_card() is still exist. Or am I misunderstanding ?
Oh yes, sorry I misread that. So why not remove cleanup_card_resources and move everything to snd_soc_unbind_card()?
Thanks, Ranjani
Thank you for your help !! Best regards
Kuninori Morimoto