18 Feb
2014
18 Feb
'14
5:14 p.m.
On 02/18/2014 04:22 PM, Charles Keepax wrote:
We will often call sync after several functions that require the DAPM mutex to be held. Rather than release and immediately relock the mutex provide an unlocked function for this situation.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
We should add lockdep_assert() to the unlocked versions to catch broken users, but that can be done in a follow-up patch.