26 Sep
2025
26 Sep
'25
6:33 p.m.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 03:53:51PM +0000, Sridharan, Ranjani wrote:
On Tue, 2025-09-23 at 16:28 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 03:27:36PM +0000, Sridharan, Ranjani wrote:
It's not exactly elegant, it's going back to the whole we need digital DAPM thing.
Can you please elaborate more on digital DAPM? I'd like to understand this better to see if that would be better for us.
It's the idea that rather than just passing an on/off state through DAPM we pass details of the digital format of the signal so that we can configure the digital elements in the path appropriately. That'd then replace all the DPCM stuff we're currently doing.